Perhaps. It's a hard tightrope to walk between synching what a character says with what a writer means. If you do that badly, having a character voice the writer's opinion then it comes across as a mouthpiece.
Except it comes at the expense of undermining, insulting, and attacking someone else. And it cheapens Anna Maria as a character for her to say behind Peter's back that he's a trophy-hunter of some kind. She was friends with Peter in Parker Industries and so on...and if this is her expression of bitter rejection that Peter in his normal state wouldn't have wanted her then it's ridiculous since Peter had his consent violated and so on.i'm down and sympathetic to that.
Well that's more or less the song since Cyrano de Bergerac you know.lets not pretend that it's an even playing field and that it's simply about unrequited love.
Inequality is a real-world term about economic and class hardships. It has nothing whatsoever to do with who looks good. Otto Octavius was born in the middle-class and certainly had a better upbringing in money terms than Peter did, if not anywhere near Osborn's level.the idea that people just need to suck up inequality until we're all equally old/dead is an interesting take, and one that i don't think will ever catch on.
People who feel they are being rejected for dates because they aren't considered attractive is not a minority or equivalent to one. Being rejected for dates and so on because someone isn't in to you (and people have a right for that, for any number of reasons...that's what consent means) isn't in any way equivalent to economic struggles.if a minority has been discriminated against their entire lives, they're allowed some negative feelings in regards to that.
In college, Harry was richer than Peter, but Peter was more good looking despite coming from a poorer background. Harry resented Peter because Gwen (who Harry dated), then Mary Jane (who Harry dated on the rebound when she and Peter broke up) preferred Peter over him. By your logic, Harry is the oppressed minority in that situation. In general, good looks used to be a way for people from lower classes to get one over. That's where the jokes about the wife with the milkman, groundskeeper, and others came from.
Generally there aren't. In general Gage has used Anna Maria well but this instance not at all. And it comes across as a writer blatantly using a character as a mouthpiece.what are the other examples of him using anna maria in this way?
It's not in character for Anna Maria to say that.