It's not like Snyder hasn't enjoyed being the centre of attention for the Snyder Cut or lambasting his critics both on the screen and with interviews. His presence is a shadow over the entire movement, and I don't recall him doing much in trying to quieten down his fanbase when they get toxic.
This is what Snyder said when Batman vs Superman wasn't well received. He's not good taking criticism, he takes it personally.
https://www.indiewire.com/2019/03/za...on-1202053359/
Your last post ignored the toxic fanbase entirely and this one they barely rate a mention. There are negative sides to every fanbase, but they won't go away by ignoring that they're a problem and leaving the people who are attacked by them as a non-issue. This ins't about the thread, I was speaking specially about your posts about the subject. This isn't bringing down a "movement," and it's not a movement, they're not fighting from civil rights here it's about a directors cut about a more with super-heroes. It's a fandom. This isn't about outsiders trying to sabotage your efforts its'a bout acknowledging the and apples and the movement itself shutting them down because they make the fandom terrible when they decide to sit back and watch rather than hold them accountable. Otherwise it looks like approval that they do speak for the fandom.
Snyder's family has nothing to do with this, what happened was a tragedy but that's about Snyder himself not his fandom. It's great that they did that charity but it comes up shirt if they're not bothering to care about what the bad apples in their fandom attack anyone who disagrees with Snyder's vision as though it's a real war. You're downplaying how bad those fans are and aren't that concerned about taking them down a notch but the people they hurt are the ones who did something wrong.
They're nothing to you because you weren't a target for their wrath, that's not how it feels on the other side.
No-one's suggesting there aren't good people in the movement. The contention is that we shouldn't dismiss the bad ones, because they make the movement look bad by association.