Results 1 to 15 of 18

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    BANNED Beaddle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    1,199

    Default Something weird about Josh Trank's Fantastic 4

    This movie got back in the news after Trank reviewed his own movie.. Made me to rethink about this film.

    Why did he and him only solely get the blame for this movie. Why wasn't Simon Kinberg equally blamed. The movie's concept had no chance because Fox was wrong to quickly make the film so they don't loose the rights. The film was made in poor judgement no arguments there. What I never understood is how Kinberg managed to escape and went on to gain more power at fox to the point of solely writing and directing an xmen movie all by himself despite the evidence that fantastic 4 was more of his vision and not Trank's. Why didn't fox just fire both Kinberg and Trank in 2015?

    Despite my feelings toward Trank unfairly getting the blame, I am still happy that things cut up with Kinberg, he was riding the cocktails of DOFP, a movie that the sole credit goes to Mathew Vaughn and Bryan Singer writing and directing experience and talents, which at that time was nearly perfect to handle the DOFP story because Vaughn had done First Class and Singer had done Valkyrie, a similar plot line of a political assassination like DOFP.


    Kinberg finally got exposed as a full hack with dark phoenix but I will still never understand why he went unscratched and Trank took the fall in 2015. weird. Must have been a case of internal connections, casting couch and personal friendships for Kinberg that Fox protected him for so long while Trank got the door.
    Last edited by Beaddle; 11-27-2019 at 12:41 AM.

  2. #2
    Ultimate Member ChrisIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    10,197

    Default

    I think some of Trank's behavior was also an issue, not just the film.
    chrism227.wordpress.com Info and opinions on a variety of interests.

    https://twitter.com/chrisprtsmouth

  3. #3
    Ultimate Member j9ac9k's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    12,116

    Default

    Trank got most of the blame because film is a director's medium. He's supposed to be the ultimate arbiter and the film has to ultimately be his vision. Directors can ask for rewrites or new writers if they don't think the script is right. Screenwriters have almost no actual power. Films sometimes end up something other than what the director wants, but this did seem to be what he intended for the most part.

  4. #4
    Invincible Member numberthirty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    24,924

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by j9ac9k View Post
    Trank got most of the blame because film is a director's medium. He's supposed to be the ultimate arbiter and the film has to ultimately be his vision. Directors can ask for rewrites or new writers if they don't think the script is right. Screenwriters have almost no actual power. Films sometimes end up something other than what the director wants, but this did seem to be what he intended for the most part.
    In addition to this, Trank has said that he had a solid version of the film in the can.

    He stepped right up, and made it about himself and the studio behind the film.

    Believing that anyone except Trank was going to be central when blame got handed out just doesn't make much sense. If it had gone the other way, it would have been the exact same way with the credit for it being a successful outing.

  5. #5
    Ultimate Member WebLurker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    10,084

    Default

    Got the impression that Trank's version was bad, too, just bad in different ways from the final cut?
    Doctor Strange: "You are the right person to replace Logan."
    X-23: "I know there are people who disapprove... Guys on the Internet mainly."
    (All-New Wolverine #4)

  6. #6
    Uncanny Member XPac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    31,711

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WebLurker View Post
    Got the impression that Trank's version was bad, too, just bad in different ways from the final cut?
    We should start trending for a Trask cut to find out for sure.

    Might make for a nice DVD boxed set along with the Snyder Cut.

  7. #7
    BANNED Beaddle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    1,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by j9ac9k View Post
    Trank got most of the blame because film is a director's medium. He's supposed to be the ultimate arbiter and the film has to ultimately be his vision. Directors can ask for rewrites or new writers if they don't think the script is right. Screenwriters have almost no actual power. Films sometimes end up something other than what the director wants, but this did seem to be what he intended for the most part.
    there are many films were the blame has gone to the writing and producing. look no further than fox own xmen series. Kinberg did get some blame on how X3 came out as a writer and producer. Urgh, it was a stupid decision that Fox did not just stop him there after X3.

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisIII View Post
    I think some of Trank's behavior was also an issue, not just the film.
    I never heard about his attitude. He can't be as bad as what Tim Miller is now. I do feel sorry for him, however I think this was the perfect time to have removed Kinberg too. there were even rumours Kinberg did some directing with F4 and I believe it because dark phoenix's direction was mediocre too.

    Trank is now tainted, no one wants to hire him. he is only making news when its F4 related.
    Last edited by Beaddle; 11-27-2019 at 01:19 AM.

  8. #8
    Invincible Member numberthirty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    24,924

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beaddle View Post
    there are many films were the blame has gone to the writing and producing. look no further than fox own xmen series. Kinberg did get some blame on how X3 came out as a writer and producer. Urgh, it was a stupid decision that Fox did not just stop him there after X3.

    ...



    I never heard about his attitude.
    He can't be as bad as what Tim Miller is now. I do feel sorry for him, however I think this was the perfect time to have removed Kinberg too. there were even rumours Kinberg did some directing with F4 and I believe it because dark phoenix's direction was mediocre too.

    Thank is now tainted, no one wants to hire him. he is only making news when its F4 related.
    Then, it must have been just you that didn't hear...

    - https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/ne...ame-fox-814764

    'Fantastic Four' Blame Game: Fox, Director Josh Trank Square Off Over On-Set "Chaos"
    Before the film opened, the director tweeted that he had made "a fantastic version" of the film that audiences would "probably never see."
    Days before Fantastic Four opened, director Josh Trank sent an email to some members of the cast and crew to say he was proud of the film, which, he wrote, was "better than 99 percent of the comic-book movies ever made."


    In Trank's case, multiple sources associated with the project say the director did not produce material that would have opened the way to a salvageable film. And by several accounts, he resisted help. "He holed up in a tent and cut himself off from everybody," says one high-level source. Literally, there was a tent on the Louisiana set. "He built a black tent around his monitor," says a crewmember. "He was extremely withdrawn." Between setups, this person adds, "he would go to his trailer and he wouldn't interact with anybody."

  9. #9
    BANNED Beaddle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    1,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by numberthirty View Post
    Then, it must have been just you that didn't hear...

    - https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/ne...ame-fox-814764
    So no headline of Kinberg? I still don't see how this make Trank look bad 100%, it feels more like a power struggle was going on between him and the other person who was also directly responsible for the film.

    James Mangold was withdrawn with Logan, so was Bryan Singer with X1/X2. they did not make F4.


    I never new much about the film before its release. I only paid attention after the aftermath of the flop.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •