Thank God Nathan isn't my kid. I'd want a refund.
"Cable was right!"
Too bad Marvel gave Takeda the boot a while back, saying her style is too “manga”. I would have liked to have seen her version of Psylocke. And I know Liu would make Psylocke more than a walking fortune cookie.
Kwannon lecturing Laura about the need to pay attention to the enemy is pretty much, in a nut shell, what’s wrong with that whole relationship. Like that would ever actually happen in any other circumstance other than Hill’s need to force Kwannon into a mentor role for Laura with absurd “teaching moments”, oh and let’s not forget the cheesy tired dialogue about rage and generic statements about not having to hide her true self. Everything about that is bad, especially when Hill expects us to believe the assassin trained from birth and read The Art Of War as a bed time story as a child needs to be told to pay attention to the enemy, and sloppily almost kills a child.
Not crazy about the internal art, but I do love that cover. Story is still not hooking me either. I agree that so far the best parts were Kwannon interacting with Mags and Sinister.
Context is king.
X-23's most basic surface level characteristic that any idiot should grasp: Stoicism.
I don't demand that her every minor appearance be a nuance in-depth examination of her character, but is it to much to ask she be written in Archetype?! This is storytelling 101! If you want people to stay invested in a character, you need to, at the bare minimum, write them such a way that they can plausibly be believed to be the same character!
Liu confirms it in an interview.
“Sana had gone through a similar journey, but in the opposite direction. After X-23, she couldn’t get work at Marvel or DC. They basically told her that her style was “too manga.” There was no room for her. So she started doing other things: designing, working for a gaming company, teaching. She thought, maybe, she wouldn’t ever do comics again.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/entertai...erview/539394/
Context is king.
X-23's most basic surface level characteristic that any idiot should grasp: Stoicism.
I don't demand that her every minor appearance be a nuance in-depth examination of her character, but is it to much to ask she be written in Archetype?! This is storytelling 101! If you want people to stay invested in a character, you need to, at the bare minimum, write them such a way that they can plausibly be believed to be the same character!
How did marvel think this was bad
original.jpg
prv9124_pg5.jpg
“Strength is the lot of but a few privileged men; but austere perseverance, harsh and continuous, may be employed by the smallest of us and rarely fails of its purpose, for its silent power grows irresistibly greater with time.” Goethe
TOO MANGA? What, does Marvel perceive Gurihiru artwork in turn as refreshingly TOO AME-COMI?
Genkai nante nai (No limits), Zettai nante nai (No absolutes)
Thank GOD for X'97. Cautious about "From the Ashes". Please no more Blue vs. Orange.