Originally Posted by
Killerbee911
I have never seen people demand that the X-mansion be covered with "nuance", I have been a fan for years I have never seen fans demand that a true counter balance to Xavier dream be presented, In fact we are probably at this point because reasonable alternatives to the X-men were never presented. But this isn't really about nuance this about some people feeling that Krakoa should be seen as bad thing and they want their fears to be validated. Over those points are showing up in stories and over and over they are being answer with "Krakoa is flawed but fine" not "Krakoa is evil".
Basically people are asking for the X-mansion to be proven to be "evil or bad" and the story doesn't care to do that because the X-men stories has never care to do that. And some day Krakoa will come to end but it won't be because Krakoa is a bad thing it will be because some writer wants to tell new status quo just like when the X-men moved to Limbo, Australia, Utopia and now Krakoa. Krakoa won't be changed because of some inherent flaw with it. The X-men didn't move from the mansion to San Francisco because the X-men line or story was flawed. Krakoa will fail because they will want to tell a new story and have new status quo so fans don't get tired of the X-men.