She wasn't having any problems with quiet council, then Scott talks with her and suddenly she has a problem. She took the right decision. But it felt more of a accessory to Scott, it really was his moment and not her.
Hickman trying to make Scott/Jean the Reed/Sue of x-men without putting any work into it, twisting personalities and Hickman's Sue was really awful
IDA. Scott and Jean seemed so committed to each other and worked as a pair here better than almost anytime in the past. They were a solid unit and the love was felt. Its hard to buy this Jean as even being involved with anyone else while currently with Scott, so yeah Logan does feel like an unnecessary complication.
For me it is all crap writing, the haracters just have to work that way because the writer want. It all feel so shallow and a joke for Jean's character
I think it will be fine, because he will write her in relation to Scott just like he did with Sue
Of course they're committed to each other. Them being with other people doesn't have to mean they love each other any less. Logan wasn't on it but I'd say you could see the love between Scott and Emma during that scene in the council too.
Scott doesn't have power over the council. The majority voted against her(I'm particularly mad at Xavier). I understand people being upset with Scott on a meta sense but in-story he did nothing wrong.
For now she won't die, who knows about the end of the run just o let a mark like Morrison and Claremont almost did.
Some writers you can't just trust
I think it means. People mad in love with each other doesn't look at the sides. Love is about compromise
Also nothing on it makes any sense and completely shit on Jean
yeah nobody said anything and he didn't had power, but for some reason Cyclops continue to be captain commander? that is very convenient. he could had a least tried to say that he wouldn't be captain commander anymore if Jean had to get out of the council.Scott doesn't have power over the council. The majority voted against her(I'm particularly mad at Xavier). I understand people being upset with Scott on a meta sense but in-story he did nothing wrong.
Last edited by baxer; 11-25-2020 at 03:03 PM.
1) Jean and Scott aren't "madly in love", they're a married couple who have been with each other for about two decades(12 years with Cable in the future + their time together from the 60's to now in the sliding timeline). They have that sort of stable relationship where they know they'll always love each other and don't need to prove anything anymore.
2) There's compromise in allowing each other to act on the feelings they have towards others instead of continuing to stick with monogamy simply because it's the norm.
Yeah I don't like that Jean was the only one with something to lose, if Scott had his position taken as well things would feel more fair. Or, more equally unfair at least. I don't blame him for not making the situation worse than it already was though.
Married people can still be madly in love. Let's not pretend all passion ends and every married couple is boring as hickman presents Scott/Jean and Reed/Sue
it's not compromise, it is the opposite of making ompromise. Specially seeing how much these people hurt her, specially Emma and Scott. This is terrible, hope she won't become a joke because of this crap writing
Well Scott should defend her, he isn't her husband? Simply not fair tht Jean keep losing alone. He relly doesn't deserve herYeah I don't like that Jean was the only one with something to lose, if Scott had his position taken as well things would feel more fair. Or, more equally unfair at least. I don't blame him for not making the situation worse than it already was though.
you act like Scott has any power to override or even influence the council. We've seen him try to express his opinion in the past and they shut him down, including Jean
The scene played out with them pretty much telling him to shut up before dismissing him. They wouldnt listen to him about his brother, so why would they listen to him about his wife?