I don't even want to know who said this.
I adored Famke in the role...Sophie left a lot to be desired.
I don't mind if the Jean actress isn't a natural redhead but she definitely needs to have red hair onscreen. I'd love Saoirse Ronan because she's the most prolific up and coming actress and she auditioned for Rey in Star Wars who has a lot in common with Jean.
Most fans and critics complained there was too much material in the film and they should have just focused on the Dark Phoenix storyline and ignored the Gifted cure storyline. Clearly Claremont's material was favored over Whedon's especially since it got a second chance. Everyone wanted a redo of Dark Phoenix, never heard anyone say they need to redo The Gifted cure storyline or adapt Dangerous or Breakworld.
They probably think that movies are like comics, that the target public is men.
Feige has been diversifying a lot, like they have a very diverse line up right now. Put more spotlight on the female superheroes, the best x-men characters are woman, so I hope that storm, Jean, kitty and Rogue will get their due
Storm and Jean are guaranteed from the very beginning. Rogue pretty much is as well although we probably won't see her until a sequel or Captain Marvel 2. Kitty I've heard they aren't that interested in because they might want to use Jubilee instead. They feel Jubilee has the advantage of being racially diverse and also a draw for 90s fans.
You're missing my point. My point is that when Last Stand came out, people said the issue was that they didn't devote enough time to the Dark Phoenix storyline which felt like the B-Plot the way it was treated and too much time was dedicated to the cure storyline which they only tried to shoehorn in because of the sudden popularity of Gifted. Everyone said they should have scrapped the cure and left the focus on Jean.
So all these years later what story was it that fans and filmmakers wanted to revisit...was it Dark Phoenix or was it The Gifted's cure? Which storyline did everyone feel was essential to give another chance to because it needed to be captured on film and given its proper due? Whether that second chance was successful or not isn't the issue here, but the fact is that Dark Phoenix was given a second chance because that's the story people wanted revisited. Nobody was clamoring for a remake of the cure because it deserved to be better done after Last Stand.
As I said before if you would be kind enough to pay attention, I'm not talking about the quality of Dark Phoenix. I'm talking about the very fact that it was made and given a second chance when Hollywood really only allows redoes and remake of super popular properties. Spider-Man for example who is so big that he was allowed three different versions in the span of less than 15 years. If there wasn't some sort of demand or interest in Dark Phoenix, the film would never have been made. Wolverine Origins was a huge flop and he's a huge character but did anybody ask or want to make a redo of his origin story?
I've said this before but notice how most X-Men adaptations are based off of Claremont's work, whether it's movies or TV shows. And the audacity of some fans who pretend that Claremont was nothing and Morrison or Whedon are superior storytellers. They only got the opportunity to do their stuff because Claremont was there first to create the foundation for them so a little more respect is due imo. Especially this nonsense that is being implied that Whedon's Gifted arc is better than The Dark Phoenix Saga.