I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.
Mignola draws mythological Thor:
The scan is from my copy of The Art of Hellboy, the original illustration being published in the Bones of Giants novel, iirc.
Last edited by Panic; 05-30-2020 at 12:25 PM.
Just ignore Aaron with anything regarding Thor and the Thor mythos
It's basically self serving self aggrandising fan fiction in my view
Nothing he writes regarding Thor is of any value what so ever as far as I'm concerned and I no longer give any money toward it
Not to say others shouldnt
But imo he's the worst Thor writer ever as far as screwing around with his mythos
He only ever does harm imo
but you know, people can make up their own mind
Now that I think on it
Moon knights god, a fairly inconsequential diety in mythos, acting through him, a relatively minor power in the marvel universe overcomes the skyfather power of odin and overcomes the direct presence of the all father Thor because the hammer is made of old moons
Whilst Thor, who still has his own power and the power of the all father can't cope
Absolutely laughing at how the writer forced this outcome to ship some idea about a relatively minor character
I mean it's do bad it's just pitiful
Imo
I never imagined anyone could do harm third mythos that I'm embarrassed to read or hear about it, but that's where it's at for me
Last edited by kilderkin; 05-30-2020 at 04:38 PM.
In case anyone was wondering, Thor won that Battle Royale that Marvel was doing on twitter, defeating Jean Grey in the final round.
One of my all-time favorite superhero theme songs:
You could say Aaron is ''running the asylum''.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.p...nningTheAsylum
I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.
I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.
Having looked again at the fight
I once suggested Aaron had a personal agenda in his writing of Thor, in effect the devastation of Thor and his mythos stemmed from an atheist agenda affecting the writing
Of course just my opinion
Looking at the script again, of humbling a god
I am once again convinced of this
Irrespective of personal views on that, I feel his writing of Thor is continuously marred and tainted by this
As I revall he once said in interview he had to come to some resolution about his own world views and writing a god
Though that's not an exact quote nor do I recall where I read it
Of course this is just my opinion, but I am reapeatedly convinced I am correct
But I've been wrong before
Last edited by kilderkin; 05-31-2020 at 10:52 AM.
I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.
I'll admit that terms a new one on me
It would be unfair of me to say he is pursuing an agenda, but I do think his writing of Thor is greviously infected with that world view
Again that's not a comment on its merits, to each their own, but I do think it is damaging to the character mythos in the way it affects the product
Again just my opinion
On a spot of positivity I thought the art was very cool
Back when Thor was the only Avenger who can hold his own against a mindless Hulk.
I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.