I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.
I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.
I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.
People are getting a bit carried away with Bendis and Thor, they forget that he also wrote a short Avengers run where he treated Thor as nothing more than a punching bag where he was knocked out by Taurus(who was surprised he even managed to do it), knocked out by Hulk using Mljonir, knocked out by some random alien bazookas... The worst thing about Bendis is he is very inconsistent and thinks the way he writes characters is the only right way to do it.
Avengers Prime was a surprisingly solid epilogue to Siege. I liked that it reminded everyone that, for all of the focus on Steve and Tony, Thor’s relationships with them are equally important.
I really don't understand why Thor needed spoilers:end of spoilers
Mjolnir to summon lightning in Empyre #2.
I might be nitpicking but still...
I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.