Originally Posted by
Superlad93
I think lazy's kind of a strange thing to call it when it's ultimately really subjective and superfluous to the day to day functionality of the character. Conner looking like Clark isn't actually something that gets brought up all that often if at all even before this. He may as well have looked like Bruce Wayne with how little it really mattered. And I remember being younger and finding the DNAlien explanation of the 90s to be charming within context, but ultimately very unintuitive. My issue ultimately being if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck, I'd rather you just tell me it's a duck rather than trying to subvert. The shift to Lex was a common sense shift towards clarity and a more user friendly origin.
But since the famous shaved head Conner story it's largely under utilized. So when you tell me the character is now more willing to go into moral gray areas (such as playing by mob rules and attacking STAR labs) and however little an addition of Lex features mixed in with the predominate Clark ones, then I'm hear for it because it operates under that same sort of clarity.
At the end of the day, we still need to get a sense of his new origins to more accurately judge.