Originally Posted by
Ezyo1000
Here's the problem with your logic. See when Wakanda was never classified as never been conquered, that should hold. Straight up. Hudlin established this in his run in 2005.. how long did it take before that was broken? Wakanda didn't hold that title for even a decade before that was broken. All for the sake of a (ishtty I might add) Doom war story to start. It doesn't matter if it's Doom, or Thanos, or whoever. 10k years unconquered and now all of a sudden anybody just waltz in and beats Wakanda? Your use the excuse "it's freaking x character" well so what? Your have the most advanced nation on earth who's never been conquered, who's stacked body's for centuries, send would be conquers home in body bags. Fighting Wakanda directly should always end up on defeat. Straight up. Thanos should never have razed Wakanda. Secret empire was an even bigger example of writer/editorial laziness. Frakking Faustus, who was already in the BP solo and is a z list villain, defeated all of Wakanda.. solo.. with a completely bullSHIT ass pull power that was unexplained how he acquired it, how it worked and then surprise surprise, he couldn't use it again after Spencer's plot needed to move on. It's like Redjack said, if you aren't clever enough to think like TChalla, then don't write BP or include BP or Wakanda in the story. Also I will add, thee have been plenty of writers that, when. Writing a story about some villain taking over the world, there were pockets of unconquered areas they didn't control, and Wakanda has been mentioned plenty of times.
Laziness and Piss should not dictate Wakanda losing