Originally Posted by
atomicbattery
And I found the exclamation point in “I very much hope it’s Babs as Oracle!” unnecessary.
It suggests enthusiasm and excitement for someone being returned to the pain of a disability.
For years there have been posters in the Barbara Gordon forum who have been advocates for her return to the role of Oracle, they say because of the positive depiction of the disabled in comics. They have also argued that the title of Batgirl is a regression- a pale, imitative version of another hero.
These very same posters then go to the Stephanie Brown and Cassandra Cain forums and passionately advocate that their favorite character be returned to the Batgirl mantle. The hypocrisy is astounding, and the motivation for the arguments for positive depictions of the differently-abled become suspect. It is a great way to stake the moral high ground, cloak yourself in virtue and shut down the discussion. After all, what kind of monster could possibly be against the portrayal of a powerful, fearless PWD in comics?
A person can make any claim that they want on the internet, but the truth is that I work with disabled kids. None of them feels that they are any less than. Like many kids today, many of them love superheroes. And their favorites are the same heroes, and they relate to the characters in the same way, as every other kid (Marvel heroes mostly, of course- Spidey in particular). I will note at these boards the first time I see a Professor X t-shirt.
Admittedly, these are elementary school kids. Perhaps there is a greater need to see yourself reflected in art as you reach teen or adulthood. Marieke Nijkamp, author of The Oracle Code, spoke beautifully, affectingly, and personally to these subjects at the Comic-Con@home ‘Batgirls’ panel.
That isn’t what I see from the posters I’vd described at these forums, however. By simply reading the contradictory posts in different forums, it is exposed as nakedly insincere and opportunistic. And that actually IS offensive.