I took your cue and made an album of my Polaris commissions, and made it public. It's in my signature now but here's the link.
https://imgur.com/gallery/huBiVmH
It doesn't include NSFW commissions (I have a few; mostly variants of SFW pieces) or the minicomic (I say plural on the post cause I plan to commission at least one more).
It's been pretty obvious to me that Marvel views female characters as second or lower tier compared to male characters. They'll sometimes say they support women, and sometimes do a project or two that's about women, but the regular operation isn't very supportive. I genuinely think that much of what they do offer is cause they don't think they can get away with doing less, and I think their attitude toward Lorna is a perfect example. When it's Jean, or Storm, or someone else high profile, Marvel knows they have to treat them as actual characters in their own right. But with Lorna, you get things like this cover from two years ago.
Can you imagine Marvel doing a cover like this focused on Jean or Storm and not having tons of backlash over it? Imagine if it was Jean in the middle with Cyclops and Professor X fighting over her, or Storm with Black Panther and Thor fighting over her. But because it's Lorna, somehow it's fine.
I remembered Worst X-Man Ever because Marvel and some of their hardcore fans will sometimes claim Lorna can't get anything due to limited resources, but then Marvel will make something like Worst X-Man Ever. A book nobody asked for, with a completely new character that hasn't been established anywhere beforehand and that Marvel has no plans to do anything with ever again. Marvel can devote precious resources to a one-off five issue miniseries like that... but they can't do a oneshot focused on Polaris? Or include her in a story arc where her history should matter? Or even so much as acknowledge her value for one panel of one page of one comic book issue?
If you ask someone at Marvel today, they'll probably say Worst X-Man shouldn't have been made and they would never make something like it now, but that's kind of a cop-out, isn't it? It's so easy to look at something that happened 4 years ago, with the lack of payoff and arguments made around it, and say "I wouldn't have done it." Especially if saying something like that means not having to deal with the consequences. Worse, successfully getting a pass on such things only encourages future behavior like it, because why bother changing for the better if you can wait a year and then come back and say "Yeah, we should've done better, but too late now." It's a perpetual denial machine.