What's that got to do with people liking different things and living and let living?
"I can understand that someone might say, 'Oh, it's a complete rip-off! What was important for me was introducing brand new characters using relationships that were embracing the history that we know to tell a story that is new — to go backwards to go forwards." - J.J. Abrams
Yeah, not so much.
Yeah, the former is the bottom line for the film industry, the latter is subjective consumer response.
Right, just like Paul is dead, the Moon landing was a hoax, and Trump had a perfect phone call with Ukraine. Moving on...
Maybe, but he has proven to be able to get good talent to together to make the movies he produces, so it's a good gamble, on paper, at least.
Would he even want to?
They were the original directors for Solo before being replaced with Ron Howard. So far as I know, the only thing that Trevorrow has said about TROS is being grateful that he was credited as contributing to the story, since some of his ideas were used in the final production.
We'll see.
As the alleged SJW Droid put it, it works.
What the frak?
We don't know what she did with the X-Wing and she buried the sabers at the end, keeping nothing herself. As far as Rey taking Luke and Leia's last name as her own, that was logically set up in the movie. Not sure where you getting the idea otherwise.
"Disgruntled: angry or dissatisfied." Seemed like a simple one-word way to say "Fans unhappy with the new movies." Sorry if that was offending. (R.E. the Force, don't see too much that we haven't seen before.)
Uh huh.
The Wikipedia article, just notes the back and forth r.e. the character, not that she is factually one. As far as Rey being a Mary Sue, my point stands that that is a fallacy, due to not fitting the information established in the films. I'm tired of having to repeat the same points on how the Mary Sue thing is factually false. (Don't like the character if that's your opinion, but give the devil his due.)
You're missing the point; I'm sure there are deleted scenes that could be used to make a longer version of TROS if the Powers That Be wanted to. However, there is no J.J. Cut of a radically different TROS.
Circumstantial evidence is not "valid." A troubled production does not prove the company is sitting on an alternate version. There is no good reason to believe that every "bad" movie has some holy grail cut in the can just because Zack Snyder is sitting on discarded footage from his time working on the Justice League movie.
Thank you!