Ok, I should make things clearer then:
Your ongoing complaints about the data pages and your perception of them as a "flaw" is completely silly and, as criticism, is nothing but an empty stretch.
The data page on Black Tom in this issue falls under the category of "extra information."
I'm sure any continuation of material on the data page regarding Black Tom will account for the possibility that not everyone will have read the data page material - or even the previous issues, for that matter - and be written in such a way that will be perfectly understandable to all. Don't worry about storylines that haven't happened yet or how these yet-to-be-told tales will be presented.
That's actually a perfect use of the data page - filling in background detail not pertinent to action driving the main plot.
Well unfortunately dude, until they fix it those ain't going anywhere. It's my right to say and I'm gonna say it. It's how I engage with the medium.
Even if it depicts a rather important development in a character's life? You think such a drastic power shift is really alright to be declared 'extra information' over, say, an expositionary spiel about what the content stolen does?
Alright, but don't be shocked if people start complaining that it feels out of nowhere or somehow forced.
Exactly, which I argue characters should not be considered as such.
Great issue. Loving this entire "CIA" angle. We can already see where the conflicts of the Intelligence Team and the Field Team will be arising though I guess Dom's responses were a direct result of the trauma. Sage's looks/expressions were also interesting and think are worthy of note. Should keep an eye on her...
Just to chime in on the data pages discussion:
I personally think they are great and a novel way (don't think they have been done before) to flesh out the story or in this case, a character, while keeping within the [22]-page limit. Reminds me of Fraction's Immortal Fist that introduced the names of the fighting styles/ moves; something that was picked up by other writers in various manners.
While I appreciate comics are a visual medium, I for one don't find the data pages offensive (especially in consideration of the above). In addition, I don't particularly think the whole Dawn of X (approach) is written for people that will "skip data pages"; something an earlier post mentioned. Think one needs to apply a bit more cerebral effort these days than what is expected from "traditional" comics simply involving good guys punching bad guys. Point is, I'm not sure the writer's expect readers to skip the data pages. Disclaimer - only reading this and X-Men religiously while scanning friends copies of Maruders so my comment on the generality of the DoX approach should be taken with a pinch of salt.
Of course all this is just my $0.02...
Well, sure.
I guess some people could also "engage" with closed doors by trying to run through them rather than opening them or "engage" with their food by throwing it against the wall rather than actually eating it. Some might say those people are doing it wrong - like, really wrong - but, you know, it's their right and everybody makes choices.
I also don't think the data pages are written with the expectations that readers will choose to skip them. There's too much care and creativity put into them for that. But it is clear that the books are structured in such a way that one could skip them and still understand the story.
I wonder this is why Jean was so brutal to the merc. I remember Jean always being averse to civilian casualties and she might get angry if people end up dying.
I think it's deliberate that the merc was humanized by having him talk about his dog and his memories. One question though. Why would he have to call his neighbor about his dog if he knowingly took a job where he could be captured or killed? He should of had a contingency plan in case he gets incapacitated. Maybe that's why Hank wasn't buying into his request for a phone call.
Both really good points!
And you do have to consider this, despite how humanised Bill was allowed to be: Is it genuine or is it a scam? But that's exactly the complexity of that narrative so far, more-so if it's never answered! It puts it on us to trust whether or not Bill was lying.
"Danielle... I intend to do something rash and violent." - Betsy Braddock
Krakoa, Arakko, and Otherworld forever!
It just keeps making what happened with Creed all the more blatantly absurd
Forget the old ways - Krakoa is god.
OBEY
That's cuz you have a kind soul lol....
But yeah I was enjoying the more reformed Sabretooth in Bunn's Uncanny and then in Pak's Weapon X. He was enjoyable as heck. Reverting him into "MONSTER" is boring IMO. And then we have tons of fans not only justifying but saying it's GREAT when their favorites act just as viciously if not worse. Rolls eyes
Forget the old ways - Krakoa is god.
OBEY