CBR ranks the most physically strong members of the Justice League

[caj]

CBR ranks the most physically strong members of the Justice League. Agree or disagree with the results? Details in the link:

https://www.cbr.com/most-powerful-st...embers-ranked/

13. Aztek
12. The Atom
11. Hawkgirl
10. Hawkman
9. Mera
8. Aquaman
7. Firestorm
6. Red Tornado
5. Lobo
4. Wonder Woman
3. Captain Marvel
2. J'onn J'onzz
1. Superman

[Agent Z]

Wondie's actually stronger than Hercules so she'd be above Shazam. Also, CBR, you can just avoid confusion by calling him Shazam.

[Pinsir]

It's 2020 people, his name is Shazam!!

[kjn]

What? No Batman on the list?

spoilers:

Sarcasm.

end of spoilers

[HAN9000]

No flash? Unscientific.

[Flash Gordon]

Mera could topple Red Tornado.

[Gaastra]

Where's supergirl? Didn't she join in the 90s?

[Dr. Poison]

When has Firestorm ever displayed super-strength?

[Robotman]

I thought The Atom basically keeps his normal punching power even if he’s tiny. I’ve never heard of him having super strength.

[achilles]

Where's supergirl? Didn't she join in the 90s?

Don't know about the 90s, but more recently she's been part of the League. And Power Girl has as well, even to the point of being the League's leader in a dystopian future from Generation Lost. Both of them would shake up those rankings a bit...

[manwhohaseverything]

It's 2020 people, his name is Shazam!!

Shazam isn't a name. it's an acronym.

[MadFacedKid]

Where’s the information pulled from for list like these..

What feats does Firestorm, or Red Tornado even have that’s comparable to pushing down an Oceanic Trench. Heck I could argue without scaling Aquaman is only beyond J’onn and Superman atleast Post-Flashpoint

[vasir12]

Shazam isn't a name. it's an acronym.

Acronyms are very often names. (Ex: Argus)

[manwhohaseverything]

Acronyms are very often names. (Ex: Argus)

No, they are used like names. But, they are still empty.acronyms have no meaning or history or cultural or anything. Names do.

[Pinsir]

No, they are used like names. But, they are still empty.acronyms have no meaning or history or cultural or anything. Names do.

That isn't how names work. According to your perimeters, no names could ever be classified as a name until they reached a certain standard, even though prior they functionally had the same utility of names...

I had cat once named Splinty, which, as far as I know, isn't a word, let alone a name with cultural and historical continuity. Would you say my cats name wasn't Splinty?