“Strength is the lot of but a few privileged men; but austere perseverance, harsh and continuous, may be employed by the smallest of us and rarely fails of its purpose, for its silent power grows irresistibly greater with time.” Goethe
“Strength is the lot of but a few privileged men; but austere perseverance, harsh and continuous, may be employed by the smallest of us and rarely fails of its purpose, for its silent power grows irresistibly greater with time.” Goethe
“Strength is the lot of but a few privileged men; but austere perseverance, harsh and continuous, may be employed by the smallest of us and rarely fails of its purpose, for its silent power grows irresistibly greater with time.” Goethe
That's been weaponised as a calling card for mutant supremacists in X-men comics since the 60's. It's Magneto's go-to excuse to kill and enslave humanity or mutants who get in his way without remorse. It's not unheard of for the oppressed to oppress others in return.
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture...erview-754889/
The "bad mutants" are a morality tale.Magneto is in there in the first issue.
Oh, I was just gonna say, but my favorite villain was Magneto. And I loved the idea of the X-Men being good mutants, and then we’d get a bunch of bad mutants, and we’d make it seem as if the bad mutants had a point there. The human race hated them and feared them and shunned them and was trying to get rid of them, so why should they take it laying down? Why didn’t they fight back?
Whereas Professor Xavier said, we’ve gotta all learn to live together, no matter how different we are. And I felt that represented some schools of thought that exist among the human race now. And it was fun to toy with that concept. And basically, the main idea was to show that bigotry is really a terrible thing, and we should all get along with each other no matter how different we are. That was the main objective. If you needed an objective for a superhero story.
I said that’s not what’s happening on Krakoa, not with Magneto back when he was being written as a Silver Age villain with a one-note “im evilllll” personality.
Oh I can assure you it existed the day the issue came out.
For one, not having a stupid system that depends on ritualistic murder. Hickman's idea is bad out of and in universe.
But for people that insist on having more death and misery...they have mutants who can kill painlessly. With a touch even. Use them for peaceful death. If you insist on "willingness to fight" go to combat on the astral/mental plane or some virtual environment.
You're missing part of the point of the Crucible. It's not about killing mutants, it's about not saturating the system by turning repowering into a challenge.
Also, you're looking at it from a human perspective. Mutants don't fear death anymore, their view on death is supposed to be changing in this new society. What looks like murder to us will slowly turn into extreme sparring to them if they keep the Resurrections going.
> Ritualistic comic book combat (like in Wakanda and Atlantis) = good
> Snuffing mutants to get their powers back = good
> using ritualistic combat to snuff mutants to get their powers back = bad?
Nah. You gotta do better than that.
Wrong on both counts.
First one is your personal feelings. That's like me preaching J**on A**on is a fraud.
The system is over-saturated because humans and other monsters keep killing mutants.
Last edited by Triniking1234; 03-23-2020 at 05:23 AM.
"Cable was right!"