Krakoa installed James Braddock as the new king of Avalon. Installed. Apocalypse explicitely stating having a powerful mutant ruling Otherworld as essential.
So yeah, I think colonize is an appropriate use of the word here.
Right now, Avalon is a puppet state to Krakoa, serving its interests and furthering its influence .
The previous leader is being dissected by Apocalypse on his spare time, and it's clear he sees other non-mutant magical wielders as threats to be dealt with.
That's not how telepathy works and you know it.
Characters being programmed/brainwashed/suggested into thinking a certain way that suits the telepath manipulating them happen all the time, they Don't Always need to be put on a leash for it to work.
It's not a prerequisite.
The Kraked traveling left and right including off-world doesn't detract from that, it's not proof in itself of their mind being free or not having been tampered.
No, they Don't. Crucible isn't necessary for the Depowered to get their power, death+ Resurection protocols is.
Said death doesn't have to occur battling a mutant madman in a gladiator area.
Saying it does is just false.
Who knows? We have no clues about the Kraked's laws regarding mutant-on-mutant Killing.
If Aero's death occured in a context similar to euthanasia, with a medical team monitoring the process and ensuring it's painless, done in a humane way, and with Aero's wits about it and accord from her parents or legal guardian?
My answer would be no, the X-Men wouldn't be murderers.
"The means are as important as the end - we have to do this right or not at all.
Anything less negates every belief we've ever had, every sacrifice we've ever made."
"Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
"No justice, no peace."
No, it's not correct.
The logistical issue the Kraked have existed the moment they decided to use the Resurrection Protocols to revive the former population of Genosha.
Saying the Depowered are the ones causing said logistical issue is false. Their million pales in comparison to the 16 millions Genoshans to revive, the Five had their plates full long before the Depowered trying to regain their powers supposedly became a problem.
The "subjects" shouldn't have to commit into laying down their lives for future fighting in order to retrieve what is rightfully theirs at the end of the day.
If the Kraked define themselves as individuals by their powers so much (and it is what's being implied in X-Men #7), then any attempt to control the access to said powers is an attempt to control their identities themselves, who is and who is not mutant.
It is abusive in nature.
And it is leveraging what shouldn't be leveraged, using Tools like social norms and stratification to press vulnerable people - the Depowered - into commiting to Something they might not have otherwise: fight and die for Krakoa.
So why Don't you call (b) for what it is? Indoctrination.
Unless conscription is mandatory on Krakoa, no, mutants shouldn't have to "jump at the chance to die in combat to get their gifts back".
Said gift being rightfully theirs, ergo, them being entitled to get them back regardless of them commiting or not commiting to fight and die for Krakoa.
The X-Men Don't seem to care about other countries laws, they just attempted to kidnapp the Richards' elder son without batting an eye about the nature of their actions…
On that point, they are clueless.
So I wouldn't be surprised if the parents of Melody had been left out of the decision's process entirely by the Kraked.
"The means are as important as the end - we have to do this right or not at all.
Anything less negates every belief we've ever had, every sacrifice we've ever made."
"Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
"No justice, no peace."
As I said they fought off an invading nation and put one of the rightful rulers back on the throne. It's a puppet state now but that's more like annexation rather than colonization.
I'll take the loss for that one since Xavier's brainwashing about the Deadly Genesis event lasted through all the nonsense that happened.
And as of X-Men #7, Krakoa is making the M-Day depowered mutants go through the Crucible to get their powers. They didn't have to before but they do now.
"Cable was right!"
"omg mind control" werent all of you all happy that mystique still hates xavier? and all the other instances of doubt and displeasure that wouldnt happen if there was mindcontrol.
less time to create uncreative mocking names and more into reading the actual issues, the dialogue and the narrative being presented on the page, please.
Last edited by Ferro; 03-10-2020 at 09:30 AM.
we could have an entire issue of x-men roundtable with everyone talking about a realistic set of pros and cons, but since it wouldnt end with the team destroying krakoa to go back to a boring mansion status quo, it would still be mind control and manipulation somehow.
People can appreciate a story and its craft, without liking its direction, both are not mutually exclusive, quite the opposite in fact.
Happens all the time, in all media, with all people.
Generally speaking, it's pointless to ask "why are you still here" as a result, especially given this thread isn't an appreciation thread.
Krakoa is a nation inhabited by humans, of course they would have the same pittfalls than any other nations out there.
They aren't the first ones to brand themselves Superior to the rest of humanity either, or reject it altogether.
No.
That in bold? That's wishful-thinking when it comes to minors Under the responsibility of their parents or legal guardians.
"The means are as important as the end - we have to do this right or not at all.
Anything less negates every belief we've ever had, every sacrifice we've ever made."
"Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
"No justice, no peace."
It is a Wonder why countries who officially Don't recognize Krakoa allow the Gates' presence on their territories, indeed.
Someone suggested on another thread that the Gates were allowed in order to flush out from clandestinity and facilitate the capture of mutants from said countries.
I tend to agree with this, it'd make the most sense.
I also think it is a matter of time before the Marauders are accused of being Krakoa's agents by someone, with all the international fallout it would cause as a result.
It Always baffles me to see them acting without masking themselves to hide their Identity and offer some deniability to Krakoa: the roster of highly-recognizable, high-profile X-Men/former X-Men isn't helping either in term of deniability.
The questions Chris asked were valid, the Marauders have very explicit ties with Krakoa, which makes their actions in other sovereign countries questionable even Under UN scrutiny.
Plenty of people appreciate the pieces of worldbuilding that are crafted into their readings, and Hickman is kind of known for that specifically too.
And generally speaking, plenty of people appreciate when there is coherence in their stories, regardless of the medium.
So, speak for yourself here, ty.
"The means are as important as the end - we have to do this right or not at all.
Anything less negates every belief we've ever had, every sacrifice we've ever made."
"Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
"No justice, no peace."
People can critique Something and still appreciate it, you are making a gross generalization of what's being said here...
I mean, if we go down this road of caricaturing other people's differing positions, it won't paint a pretty picture of Krakoa's defenders on this forum either.
Which is not the point of said forum, let alone this thread. So please, Don't.
It didn't.
Some poster felt pressed in the discussion and tried to settle and "win" the argument by bringing her up, that's all.
"The means are as important as the end - we have to do this right or not at all.
Anything less negates every belief we've ever had, every sacrifice we've ever made."
"Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
"No justice, no peace."
Yeah lmaoo this whole perception is a farce and a half to me. People really love jumping to exasperated and uninformed claims i.e. “The X-men are just like Nazis now!” so much so that it’s laughable. First of all nazis/white aryan, people were never a targeted or oppressed minority group so their “pride” stemmed directly from racism/bigotry, not finding “pride” in something you’ve been told your whole life is a curse or has a cultural stigma. The obvious difference between white/aryan/nazi “pride” and for instance gay, black, or in this instance mutant “pride”.
Secondly the nazis’ entire structure was built upon an offensive strategy, to acquire more territories to impose their ideology/bigotry whereas the X-men are not only defensive in nature but also have pro-outsider protection policies in place to keep the peace as well as a massive global good will offering of life saving drugs to ease the transition of becoming a nation state while also building public trust in a newly established regime. Diametrically opposed to the nazis, their ethnic cleansing offensives towards neighboring territories and their innate bad will perceived but surrounding areas due to their lies on what they would do vs what they actually ended up doing. The X-men have not lied about their need and right to secure a safe haven for mutantkind, protected by legislation made for them, not in spite of them. They literally told the gathering of world leaders their exact plan, which was to go about the securing of their nation/status by utilizing the same financial manipulation means that mankind uses all the time. Fighting for their place in world affairs using their brain and not their fists now, a far smarter tactic that every advanced nation in the world has done.
Lastly, the nazis’ belief in Aryan “Superiority” were based on lies and delusions of self grandeur, snake oil “science” scrounged up to support the false claim that any sect of the human race is innately more good, more intelligent, and more capable than other sects based on physical characteristics and self appraising adaptations of “history”. It was bigotry, wrapped in a lie and sold to the world as a fact. A masterclass in marketing, but based on fraudulence and weak insecurity. The X-men/mutantkind while a derivative of the human race, are factually not Homo Sapiens. They are genetically different, literally further evolved, and an altogether different species than man because of it. There is no lie there. While similarities are clear and present, the difference is encoded down to DNA itself. And because of envy and hatred by those who consider themselves “left behind” vestiges in the evolutionary line, mutants have been persecuted because of it, while their population was still small enough to do so. Krakoa is the physical manifestation of the mutants’ stance towards continuous anti-mutant world affairs, “No More”. They are going to protect their inevitable, growing population by securing a mutant homeland that will safeguard their progress while doing so within the bounds and stipulations of world governance, essentially legitimizing them. The only difference is they’re not taking no for an answer. They’re not “accepting” humanity’s mercurial handouts of respect and civility anymore, they are demanding it. To some that may seem aggressive, but aggressive stances are sometimes needed to make change in aggressive societies. To many, black activists “causing riots” in the streets, stoking trouble by not sitting in “their” assigned sections, and “provoking” violence by being tireless in their efforts seemed like an “aggressive” agenda and maybe it was. But it was what was necessary to accomplish anything in a society that was already in an aggressive stance towards people of color already. Any real change in this world is hard fought and stubbornly pursued, no matter the backlash of a world that hates “change”. Nazism however stemmed from a people/society that were already in a place of privilege, but then decided that they wanted, that they DESERVED more. That is the glaring difference and why I don’t understand why people insist on these erroneous and shallow comparisons between mutantkind in Dawn of X and these falsely equivalent real life scenarios. It just seems like gas lighting, but the scary thing is that people actually believe it?
Anyway, that’s my 10 cents on the matter and I won’t hold this thread up on this topic any longer. Just had to address what I saw when it comes to these patently ludicrous claims.
Please don't what?
Chris' counter-argument to the gates is that the government wouldn't allow it in real life but since the 1960s we already know the government in the comic books don't operate the same way as in real life because it's fiction.
You can critique the books but criticize them based on the content inside of the book instead of making up a bunch of weak strawman arguments and headcanon to justify your distaste for the book.
"Cable was right!"