9211a130fd4f275c570db5b4d951583f.jpg
The 'WHAT HAPPENED TO' single issue Claremont device that doesn't even seen possible anymore in X-Books. Kurt more or less breaks the fourth wall during his without-a-net downward spiraling arc when he leaves the team for a few panels to meet with Father Bowen and discuss his collapse of faith and purpose - and then it's hell-bent for destruction as he pushes himself further and further through injury, pain and reckless brow furrowing angst toward that most certain crash into a coma.
I hear you Sundowhn. It seems that Kurt's hard fought breakthroughs and breakdowns (even his death and resurrection) are never centrally important to the core story. In both a good and bad way, Nightcrawler isn't a linchpin character. He could never serve as the hub through which a major crossover or core flagship event could bind.
But he's an incredibly successful bridge between the real audience and the hyperbolic audacity of insanely pitched dramas and impossible scenarios that are comic books. With Kurt out there in the periphery to ferry from shore to shore across the panels and pages, these events are far more accessible and sustainable.
That's great. Wonderful. But it's also a dead end and a role somebody else could take. Nightcrawler is popular enough in the right creative hands to leave the X-Men and serve as a known free-agent in any Marvel title, with any major hero or team, in any scenario or setting, he could easily have mini solos and serve as a roving hero on his own. That's about the best I could hope for any of the OG ANAD team members, especially post-Xavier, post-Scott, post-VS, post-Claremont...
Yet, it's Kurt 'd most like to be let go from the burden of propping up whatever the modern day X-Men are supposed to be now. He's there primarily, IMO, to create the sense that the X-Men of old are still there and that there's no cause to be alarmed. He's part of a failsafe against total collapse. But I don't think he's even feeling the pressure of that possibility. There is no weight, no real pressure, nothing to really bulwark or even give a little good ol blue elf charm and spirit to...it's not there.
Set him free. Kill him! Seriously! Make that the storyline. Given his current immortality and how he'd actually feel and respond to that and its implications/causes IMO the death-wish persona would be perfect. It'd be conflicting, progressive, permeable, multifaceted and functionally supportive to many titles and storylines within and beyond the X-Men.
He could be anywhere and everywhere and that's not something every Marvel hero could actually do without having to split into multiple versions of themselves.
BAMF! It's a 'cool' intro and outro and who better to embrace being a B.A.M.F. with grace and wit and humility than Kurt?
Dick Grayson made this transition. He's a great template and forerunner for how a sidekick can change and graduate, get out on their own and succeed.
And they both were trapeze artists in the circus. And they both stood in the shadows of brooding seriousness with light, hope and goodness that doesn't and never did deny the dark...actually they both accept it and choose to deal with it their own way. Only, Robin flew the cave.
I can't at all advocate or defend anything good about Austen's 'Draco'. I can hardly even address it. I can't actually. Best I can do is turn away from it and surrender to the fact that yes, it's there, but no way am I turning around to engage, acknowledge or endorse it.
3a1deda2a6d26d660cf344067a95edb7.jpg
Oh and do re-read the last Claremont solo series Nightcrawler fans! Please do.
In retrospect, much after its initial run - the thing really gets to me. It's way more personal and painfully rewarding than it was for me originally. Even the mess of a Bess ending, it's...well, it's hard to explain but it's perfect in an imperfect way...in perfectly imperfect world...a perfectly imperfect hero...kinda sorta whatever and yet and so, very much so!