View Poll Results: Should Wanda Maimoff stand trial fot her role in House of M ?

Voters
110. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    53 48.18%
  • No

    57 51.82%
Page 37 of 123 FirstFirst ... 273334353637383940414787 ... LastLast
Results 541 to 555 of 1837
  1. #541
    Chaos bringer GenericUsername's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,050

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroHomo View Post
    lol Lawd Yes!!

    lol Let 'em know!!!!!

    Hmmm oh really
    You know what Amnesty is right? Also technically his Mutant Massacre wouldn't count as attempted genocide against the mutant race



    Dude preeetty sure no one thinks Sinister and Apocalypse are hero's perhaps in lieu of trying to sway people really read what they're posting?


    Sooo that excuses her killing countless Mutants? Also I think she set her house on fire and her adopted mom died in the fire

    euthanasia?

    Well he was trying to mutate the human population...aaaand it was temporary aaaand only affected the 616 universe


    Go the O.J. route??
    She didn't set the house on fire that her mom died in and her mom is not dead. She set a barn on fire when her mutant powers manifested. And anti-Romani/anti-mutant bigots set their house on fire. It was believed that Django and Marya died in that fire. But later on both were shown to be alive. Wanda's house that was burned by anti-mutant/anti-synthezoid bigots was the one she shared with Vision. Also her mom was changed, again. So now it's Natalya and not Marya, nor Magda.
    Love is for souls, not bodies.

  2. #542
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    4,112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroHomo View Post
    lol Lawd Yes!!

    lol Let 'em know!!!!!


    Hmmm oh really
    You know what Amnesty is right? Also technically his Mutant Massacre wouldn't count as attempted genocide against the mutant race
    Genocide's bad under every circumstance, and they don't have to succeed for it to be bad. Do you care about the Morlocks? Wanda didn't erase the mutant race, either, but you're siding with the person who has no remorse over it and did it with direct intent. He was so unconcerned about killing anyone who knew of it he wanted dead.

    I know what amnesty is. However, getting it shouldn't be a "get out of jail free card" for every monster they can get their hands on who tried to murder the X-men in their super-hero careers, sometimes all at once. Which Sinister attempted with the Marauders in Carey's run. If Xavier had offered that amnesty to Wanda would you be so forgiving like you are with Sinister?

    Sinister's a good example since he's technically not a mutant and stole the x-gene he's using from Thunderbird. The only reason Wanda isn't a mutant at the moment was because of rights issues between Fox and Marvel, and this'll be retconned back soon since Marvel got the X-men back.

    Dude preeetty sure no one thinks Sinister and Apocalypse are hero's perhaps in lieu of trying to sway people really read what they're posting?
    You're defending Sinister in this very post. Read any thread about the Crucible, Apocalypse is a rock star and whenever his villainous activities in Excalibur are bought up they're given a shrug or ignored entirely. Which is strange considering how Rogue and Betsy are popular X-men. I'm reading the intent clearly, but I am intrigued why this is the time to put on the breaks that supporting X-villains is bad, and continue defending Sinister. He ordered Pryor's death during the Morlock Massacre, when she was a civilian, and it didn't raise an eyebrow.


    Sooo that excuses her killing countless Mutants? Also I think she set her house on fire and her adopted mom died in the fire
    That was a random straw man to derail our talk about Wanda's history with anti-mutant bigotry. Others have gone over the details of the fire. Do you know how the twins met Magneto?

    euthanasia?
    It'd be difficult to find something that'd truly end Sinister.

    Well he was trying to mutate the human population...aaaand it was temporary aaaand only affected the 616 universe
    Remind me, what story arc was this from. Lots of "buts" for a man who tried to wipe Morlocks off the endangered species list. Did you read Carey's X-men?

    Go the O.J. route??
    Sinister would certainly attempt a joke at OJ if he were put on trial for his attempts at genocide.

  3. #543
    Astonishing Member Zelena's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    4,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Inquisitor View Post
    You're defending Sinister in this very post. Read any thread about the Crucible, Apocalypse is a rock star and whenever his villainous activities in Excalibur are bought up they're given a shrug or ignored entirely. Which is strange considering how Rogue and Betsy are popular X-men. I'm reading the intent clearly, but I am intrigued why this is the time to put on the breaks that supporting X-villains is bad, and continue defending Sinister. He ordered Pryor's death during the Morlock Massacre, when she was a civilian, and it didn't raise an eyebrow.
    People are fascinated by power and Sinister and Apocalypse are considered as "bigger guns" than Rogue and Betsy, which I found offensive for these latter. Maybe women are considered as less important in comics…

    I wonder if the feelings would have be the same if Wanda were a mutant and a man…
    “Strength is the lot of but a few privileged men; but austere perseverance, harsh and continuous, may be employed by the smallest of us and rarely fails of its purpose, for its silent power grows irresistibly greater with time.” Goethe

  4. #544
    Better than YOU! Alan2099's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,503

    Default

    Well he was trying to mutate the human population...aaaand it was temporary aaaand only affected the 616 universe
    I'm not sure why you think trying to force the entire human race to mutate is a good idea.
    it was only temporary BECAUSE somebody stopped him. He had no intentions of it being temporary. This was going to be the new status quo and he openly looked forward t the chaos it was going to cause.
    The whole thing about Wanda affecting the entire multiverse is absolute BS and you know it. This information came from Beast and Forge, who are hardly experts on the multiverse, it's directly contradicted by other times we have seen the multiverse AND the fact that mutants from other realities were immune to her powers. On top of all that, the ability to affect the entire multiverse would make her more powerful than any cosmic character we have seen before. Do you really believe Scarlet Witch is as powerful as the In-Betweener, Galactus, Eternity, or the Infinity Gauntlet?

    Remind me, what story arc was this from. Lots of "buts" for a man who tried to wipe Morlocks off the endangered species list. Did you read Carey's X-men?
    Uncanny X-men 379 and 380.

  5. #545
    Ultimate Member JKtheMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Bedford UK
    Posts
    10,323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wiccan View Post
    If she's not a mutant Krakoa has no right to persecute her

    If she's a mutant Krakoa's memo is to pardon all mutants for their previous crimes

    The queen will be free either way.
    Personally, I suspect the hard line taken on whether she is a mutant taken by Hickman is part of a long play to re-establish her as a mutant.

    I can see it now. The easiest way to do it is to put her on trial and one strand of defence comes from someone who stands neutral to time and reality manipulation (pick your watcher analog).

    All they would need to say is that when she said “No More Mutants” she effectively changed reality around herself and made it such that she was no longer a mutant. This then explains why the newer chronology doesn’t quite add-up and it sends Wanda into a new (or yet another) arc of self-discovery where she changes reality back to how it should be.

    Of course, none of this would make her guilty or not guilty, but it could help with the defence to demonstrate she was equally a victim of the situation. Plus becoming a mutant again would give Krakoa a dilemma. All very juicy storytelling fodder.
    “And I urge you to please notice when you are happy, and exclaim or murmur or think at some point, 'If this isn't nice, I don't know what is.” ― Kurt Vonnegut Jr.

  6. #546
    Extraordinary Member BroHomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Da Souf
    Posts
    6,743

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Inquisitor View Post
    Genocide's bad under every circumstance, and they don't have to succeed for it to be bad. Do you care about the Morlocks? Wanda didn't erase the mutant race, either, but you're siding with the person who has no remorse over it and did it with direct intent. He was so unconcerned about killing anyone who knew of it he wanted dead.
    Dude. Obviously.
    but the Morlock Massacre is an example of attempted Genocide against the Morlocks not all of mutantkind
    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Inquisitor View Post
    I know what amnesty is. However, getting it shouldn't be a "get out of jail free card" for every monster they can get their hands on who tried to murder the X-men in their super-hero careers, sometimes all at once.
    That's literally what it means tho. And not every monster...just mutant monsters lol
    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Inquisitor View Post
    If Xavier had offered that amnesty to Wanda would you be so forgiving like you are with Sinister?
    Dude No one is forgiving of Sinister....not sure why you are ignoring that bit of info. Would I be cool with Wanda having Amnesty? I def wouldnt trust her ever if I were one of the mutants. It woulda been cool had she came to Xavier after KraKoa was formed....as a sign of peace and penance buuuut she didnt sooooo
    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Inquisitor View Post
    Sinister's a good example since he's technically not a mutant and stole the x-gene he's using from Thunderbird. The only reason Wanda isn't a mutant at the moment was because of rights issues between Fox and Marvel, and this'll be retconned back soon since Marvel got the X-men back.
    Well this sinister is a mutant clone of Sinister..sooo hes always had an X-Gene. Not sure whyyyy the movieverse is being brought up...


    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Inquisitor View Post
    You're defending Sinister in this very post. Read any thread about the Crucible, Apocalypse is a rock star and whenever his villainous activities in Excalibur are bought up they're given a shrug or ignored entirely. Which is strange considering how Rogue and Betsy are popular X-men. I'm reading the intent clearly, but I am intrigued why this is the time to put on the breaks that supporting X-villains is bad, and continue defending Sinister.
    Correcting wrong and false statements/accusations isnt in defense of a person. If anything its a defense against fake facts.


    Quote Originally Posted by Zelena View Post
    People are fascinated by power and Sinister and Apocalypse are considered as "bigger guns" than Rogue and Betsy, which I found offensive for these latter. Maybe women are considered as less important in comics…
    lol Dude there's no other superhero franshise where the women are as celebrated and powerful than the Xmen. Buuuuut if you wanna keep up that narrative...go head.
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelena View Post
    I wonder if the feelings would have be the same if Wanda were a mutant and a man…
    Yeah...probably
    GrindrStone(D)

  7. #547
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    4,112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroHomo View Post
    Dude. Obviously.
    but the Morlock Massacre is an example of attempted Genocide against the Morlocks not all of mutantkind
    This is a very bizarre response when the subject is of genocide. Given how marginalised Morlocks are within the mutant community in Marvel I'd have thought you'd be more emotionally invested in their safety. Maybe you're not a fan of Marrow, or Callisto so their passing wouldn't affect you.

    That's literally what it means tho. And not every monster...just mutant monsters lol
    It's how it was used that I was disagreeing with. Mutants can't be monsters in your eyes? Intriguing.

    Dude No one is forgiving of Sinister....not sure why you are ignoring that bit of info. Would I be cool with Wanda having Amnesty? I def wouldnt trust her ever if I were one of the mutants. It woulda been cool had she came to Xavier after KraKoa was formed....as a sign of peace and penance buuuut she didnt sooooo
    Your response in the prior post suggests otherwise, and so does this one with your first paragraph. I know this is comic books so it's necessary to not view everything as emotionally "real" but your reactions between what Wanda and Sinister doing is startling. Would you be so lenient had Sinister not been in Krakoa, I wonder? You don't trust the woman who was having the worst day of her life and was a veteran super-hero and had remorse for what she did but a man who does the same thing who had no regrets and is someone who is defined by being an edgy super-villain is ok.

    When did Sinister ever do any penance for Krakoa? He's still a super-villain and everyone knows it. Even Exodus does. But you're right, she's not on Team Krakoa so she must therefore be bad.

    Well this sinister is a mutant clone of Sinister..sooo hes always had an X-Gene. Not sure whyyyy the movieverse is being brought up...
    Semantics. Sinister was "born" in the 18th century as a human transformed by Apocalypse. He's not a mutant. The context was for why Wanda wasn't a mutant, you know what I was getting at. It's known that Sinister can possess his cloned bodies. His theatrics on Krakoa are an act akin to the Joker. But You this.

    Correcting wrong and false statements/accusations isnt in defense of a person. If anything its a defense against fake facts.
    Nothing I've said has been false. It is possible to do what you saying as a neutral observer but that's not what you've been doing. When accountability comes for Sinister it's all "but.." and when it comes to Wanda she's got to go. No questions asked.

    lol Dude there's no other superhero franshise where the women are as celebrated and powerful than the Xmen. Buuuuut if you wanna keep up that narrative...go head.
    It's not a narrative when it's the truth. You don't want Quicksilver's head on a platter.

    Yeah...probably
    Yes, definitely. M-Day involved Quicksilver, there are no threads calling for his trial - all the attention is on Scarlet Witch. Maybe Wanda should have tried lying that it was a Skull who did M-Day like he did and nobody would hate her anymore.

  8. #548
    Invincible Member Havok83's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    28,056

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Inquisitor View Post
    Yes, definitely. M-Day involved Quicksilver, there are no threads calling for his trial - all the attention is on Scarlet Witch. Maybe Wanda should have tried lying that it was a Skull who did M-Day like he did and nobody would hate her anymore.
    No people would still hate her
    Last edited by Havok83; 05-04-2020 at 07:23 AM.

  9. #549
    Extraordinary Member CRaymond's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    5,733

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zelena View Post
    I don't take comics seriously.

  10. #550
    Astonishing Member Zelena's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    4,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroHomo View Post
    lol Dude there's no other superhero franshise where the women are as celebrated and powerful than the Xmen. Buuuuut if you wanna keep up that narrative...go head.
    Women were celebrated in Claremont's world.
    In Hickman's world, it is between Xavier, Magneto and Apocalypse…

    Yes, there's Moira who once a good woman, now so ruthless and unemotional that she is unrecognizable. She's just used as a plot device and will, probably, end under a glass dome to be sure the universe won't reset. Who needs her opinion? What will she do? Threatening suicide?
    Hickman's run is the revenge of patriarchy. (What are you doing, Jean? Preparing the meal while the men are talking?)

    Betsy is one of the rare gems that shines in this bleak landscape.

    Quote Originally Posted by CRaymond View Post
    You're shining too…
    “Strength is the lot of but a few privileged men; but austere perseverance, harsh and continuous, may be employed by the smallest of us and rarely fails of its purpose, for its silent power grows irresistibly greater with time.” Goethe

  11. #551
    Astonishing Member Veitha's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    4,418

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zelena View Post
    Women were celebrated in Claremont's world.
    In Hickman's world, it is between Xavier, Magneto and Apocalypse…

    Yes, there's Moira who once a good woman, now so ruthless and unemotional that she is unrecognizable. She's just used as a plot device and will, probably, end under a glass dome to be sure the universe won't reset. Who needs her opinion? What will she do? Threatening suicide?
    Hickman's run is the revenge of patriarchy. (What are you doing, Jean? Preparing the meal while the men are talking?)

    Betsy is one of the rare gems that shines in this bleak landscape.



    You're shining too…
    You're not even reading the current comics, how do you know how the women are treated.

    Emma, Kitty, Moira and Betsy are all powerful women in positions of power in this new status quo.

  12. #552
    Astonishing Member Zelena's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    4,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Veitha View Post
    You're not even reading the current comics, how do you know how the women are treated.

    Emma, Kitty, Moira and Betsy are all powerful women in positions of power in this new status quo.
    Well, tell me, do they go with the flow or do they show any personality? I only saw that from Betsy… But you're right, I haven't seen everything.
    “Strength is the lot of but a few privileged men; but austere perseverance, harsh and continuous, may be employed by the smallest of us and rarely fails of its purpose, for its silent power grows irresistibly greater with time.” Goethe

  13. #553
    Mighty Member houndsofluv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    1,576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zelena View Post
    Well, tell me, do they go with the flow or do they show any personality? I only saw that from Betsy… But you're right, I haven't seen everything.
    kitty killed a woman (Deathstrike clone) by phasing a pillow thru her heart then solidifying. my personal favourite means of showing personality and going w/ the flow lol

    jokes aside, if anything's shining thru DOX I'd say its personality. Characters have for the most point felt on point and in the right voice. The "robotic dialogue" criticisms were only really applicable to one section of one issue which was primarily for expository purposes but I digress lol

    didn't even realize how off-topic I was being until I read the thread title.........whew but my words stand
    kim on tha plane.jpg
    Last edited by houndsofluv; 05-04-2020 at 10:53 AM.

  14. #554
    Astonishing Member Zelena's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    4,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by houndsofluv View Post
    kitty killed a woman (Deathstrike clone) by phasing a pillow thru her heart then solidifying. my personal favourite means of showing personality and going w/ the flow lol
    Is killing someone having a personality? Not the one I would usually associated with Kitty Pryde… But this girl seems to be long lost.

    To be more in topic, I would say Wanda wasn't herself when she said 'No more mutants'… Emotional turmoil and all…
    The Krakoans don't have this excuse, luv…
    “Strength is the lot of but a few privileged men; but austere perseverance, harsh and continuous, may be employed by the smallest of us and rarely fails of its purpose, for its silent power grows irresistibly greater with time.” Goethe

  15. #555
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    4,026

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zelena View Post
    Is killing someone having a personality? Not the one I would usually associated with Kitty Pryde… But this girl seems to be long lost.

    To be more in topic, I would say Wanda wasn't herself when she said 'No more mutants'… Emotional turmoil and all…
    The Krakoans don't have this excuse, luv…
    the krakoans are a nation hence above simple black or white justifications of morality, instead being in a pragmatic grey, and then each individual on their own "moral standart", but you compare krakoa to other nations.
    wanda maximooff commited genocide and has a nerve to call herself a hero, a paragon of virtue and godnes as we see in uncanny avengers belives she is owed.
    Last edited by Ferro; 05-04-2020 at 11:56 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •