It depends. His DAREDEVIL runs have been legendary and groundbreaking storytelling in the medium, but then I find some of his work utterly baffling (i.e. ALL-STAR BATMAN).
It depends. His DAREDEVIL runs have been legendary and groundbreaking storytelling in the medium, but then I find some of his work utterly baffling (i.e. ALL-STAR BATMAN).
Last edited by KNIGHT OF THE LAKE; 08-09-2020 at 09:39 AM.
I'm not a great fan, but I absolutely acknowledge the man is talented, and had a multiple, seminal influences on The Big Two.
Personally, I find his work darker (both story and images) than I typically like. I don't mind a bit of dark now and then, but all the time, and especially when seeming to work at it gets a bit tedious.
Even in the claims that his best work is behind him, I can find something to admire. It strikes me that, like Simonson, he's one of those who pushes himself to try something new, rather than just feed publishers rehashes of his greatest hits. It just so happens that what interests him to try next has not worked for a lot of us in the last several years.
I actually like Frank's art up until very recently. However I see how say his art on something like Dark Knight Strikes Again, where he's going for more overt satire and morphing his style into a blend of Kirby and Crumb, would be off putting to some folks.
Love him as a writer, up until say about the year 2005 or so.
There are some fair criticisms of his work:
X-Books Forum Mutant Tracker/FAQ- Updated every Tuesday.
I appreciated Miller's work as a writer (Daredevil: Born Again, The Dark Knight Returns) more than his artwork, but both those examples were over a quarter century ago when he was at the top of his game as a storyteller. Today, not so much, but that's just my opinion.
Avatar: Here's to the late, great Steve Dillon. Best. Punisher. Artist. EVER!
It’s a shitty criticism for several reasons in regard to “whores.”
Miller never really dismissed sex workers in his work as “whores”. They were generally strong independent women with a moral code who took after their own, and took no **** from the bad guys of the story.
Despite his turn toward more conservative views, Miller was actually very progressive and sex positive. Something his critics were not. That’s really not his fault. None of the protagonists ever looked down on these women for their profession.
If we wanted to be honest, Miller is not without fault, but writing sex workers as something other than trash was actually a pretty great thing.
Moore and Miller tend to write women rather poorly.
Is there a story where Frank didn't make the lead female a sex worker sans Elektra? And wrote them strong? I can think of 2, maybe 3 for Moore ...
That being said, his artwork is hit and miss for me. Same with his writing. They usually save one another when one is poor.
I would say his writing is his best creative facility, second to his ability to generate new ideas. His art is a bit of an acquired taste I think, a bit like Corben (whom I love and l have met a lot that don't).
But when he is on fire with both, he is one of the greats.
Last edited by BeastieRunner; 08-10-2020 at 11:27 PM.
"Always listen to the crazy scientist with a weird van or armful of blueprints and diagrams." -- Vibranium
Martha Washington would be the main one. Wonder Woman. WW and Supes daughter. Lara? Carrie Kelly. Of course Elektra.
Catwoman is the only superhero character he did that to.
I’m reticent to even include Sin City. No one in those books is exactly on the right side of the law. It’s right there in the title.
X-Books Forum Mutant Tracker/FAQ- Updated every Tuesday.
Exclude Sin City, and let’s get into all the whores.
You can also just call them prostitutes, or sex workers. Whores is super derogatory.
And did he retcon prostitution into Catwoman? Was it ever stated she was an actual prostitute? It’s been a while...
I think it's pretty fair to say that the implication in Batman: Year One was that Kyle and Holly were hookers. They couldn't state it out right because I'm pretty sure it was still a code approved comic.
The harder question to ask for some readers is, if Frank is obsessed with "whores"...so? His sex workers aren't meant to be seen as degraded people. He's even said that his prostitutes weren't meant to be a realistic portrayals of the sex trade. Selina and Holly are hookers who eventually turn against their pimp and regain their agency. Why would showing that be a bad thing? The prostitutes in Sin City make their own rules and police their neighborhood themselves. Gail is as bad-ass as any action heroine in comics.
Plus, I agree with with your other point...people who go on about Frank and his whores conveniently leave out Electra, Martha Washington and Casey from Ronin.