Okay so I'm bored. This is Andre in his prime with all his size and strength but without being overweight as seen here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4O2zl2GcDi4
Granted, it's still a choreographed fight but I'm just showing how agile he was then.
In real life, he was 6'11" and probably weighed 350 back then. I saw a very old thread about this fight from 15 years ago so I don't think that counts. Then, I went to a martial arts board and saw a thread also from about 15 years ago, expecting they would say this fight is ridiculous and that Andre would have no chance. Surprisingly, black belts were having a serious debate about it. It ranged from "Bruce just takes out his knees or ankles, the end" to "In martial arts, we *say* that size and strength don't matter but this is a difference that is ridiculous."
I thought about making it Chuck Norris instead of Bruce Lee but then people would say Chuck wins simply because he has legitimately proven feats in real fights, sports though they are, and Andre doesn't. So I stuck with Bruce because his "feats" have the same kind of fantasy hype that Andre's feats have since any film evidence we have is choreographed in both cases.
So extreme size and weight versus skill basically. Andre vs Bruce.
It should go without saying that this is hand to hand only. No rules other than that.