On that I think some things should be said.
http://www.moongadget.com/origins/dune.html
While preparing to do the movie version of Dune in 1984, Frank Herbert found they had to make change after change after change after change after change because he was informed that, if they didn't, millions of people with no background knowledge would accuse Dune of being a ripoff of Star Wars. Herbert had never seen Star Wars or paid any attention to it. But he decided to watch it and was quoted as saying he found more similarities than grains of sand in a desert. He considered suing but was convinced by lawyers that the similarities always stayed just short of outright plagiarism by the legal definition.
Then there is the similarity to Samurai movies.
Then there's the similarity to the King Arthur story.
Then there's Flash Gordon.
It IS creative to take so many sources- more than I have named- and merge them into a coherent original story.
At the same time, I'm reminded of the Star Trek story where Data solved an original Sherlock Holmes mystery in the Doyle style only to have Geordi point out that he just recognized elements from a bunch of different Holmes stories and combined them.
This is NOT directed at you personally but I think, for a lot of people, it comes down to nothing more than the fact that they love Star Wars so none of these facts are valid or count. But they don't like the MCU so any and all derivation (even when it's just from the original source material) and any copying is absolute proof that the MCU has no originality or imagination.