Well we can look at Mets' most recent post on the matter for examples. Beyond the usual twisting of questions asked (Behavior = People?), minimizing of harmful conservative actions/policies, projecting Insults into a post which doesn't have any, and claiming that occasionally calling vile/hateful/criminal people idiots excuses defending violence & bigotry (Family Separation, LoTT, Misinformation used to drive up Anti-LGBTQ+ Hysteria, Daniel Perry killing Jordan Neely, etc) there's an argument that posters here are ignoring things that were never brought up in this thread (EX: Search for Laphonza).
Mets, if you wanted anyone's opinions on something specific you could have asked it politely in a non-loaded way. Instead you bring up specific things to accuse others of double standards which were never previously brought up or discussed, and that isn't debating in good faith. It's also a decorum breach to do so, is another double-standard on display, and is at-least mildly insulting if not a direct insult. None of this shows you in a less deceptive/disingenuous light either.
Your link is broken, but I'm not surprised at the story at all.
It's the reason I'm virulently anti-Organized Religion yet paradoxically don't deride people for their faith if they hold to it. Now if they are Christians in the "Jesus is too liberal" group or ignore his teachings on hate, violence, and greed . . that's another story. And considering how many are adulterers I think they should have as much scrutiny on their sex lives as they are willing to put on others.
Only authoritarians and extremists benefit from this sort of violence around the world, which is why we're seeing such an up-tick in far-right gains in politics AND far-right violent rhetoric & action. They go hand-in-hand.
Honestly if we entertain those threatening to "blow up the world" then we will deserve it when they eventually do anyway. This behavior cannot be entertained as it only encourages more brinksmanship and threats.
We often have US elected politicians calling for LGBT to be eliminated in direct/indirect ways, and we have those bending over backwards to give them the benefit of the doubt to excuse still voting for them.