Only when there is literally no response left but violence will I back it. I don't disagree with how you think things are going, I just don't think we're there yet. Laws making it easier to run over protestors and similar ones to silence dissent are a bad indication, and clearly unjust laws should most definitely be resisted, protested, or broken if necessary.
That's reassuring to hear, anger is one thing and can be used productively if not allowed to take over. Hate winds up rotting you from within, and should be resisted and stripped of support at every opportunity as far as I'm concerned.
I also believe that failure to punish clear wrongdoing for fear that the GoP (who's already breaking the rules to punish their opponents and those who speak out) will 'weaponize it' isn't a logical plan and will lead to long-term problems like the ones we are seeing today with constant attacks on any checks on the GoP's illegal & immoral actions.
I somehow doubt the veracity of polls that have him that high, but it is worrying that this guy isn't laughed out of the race.
A big chunk I believe comes from fear of conservative backlash, but if fear stops you from doing what you know is right there are words which describe that. There's no logical reason NOT to do everything possible to change a republican party I chose to continue supporting, if I wanted to be correct rather than on the 'right' side.
Republicans want people and organizations to stay in their lane after all, just look at Disney. The constitution gives everyone freedom of religion and prevents their being an official state religion to ensure that freedom. If churches want to get involved in politics they should pay the entrance fee. Of course the screams of "They're attacking Christianity!" will be heard from coast-to-coast, heedless of how they've been attacking other religions (Sharia Law! Jews will not replace us!) from the beginning.
The arguments made by people on this forum aren't as important as the ones made by actual policy-makers. Your obsession with definition, policy, and being right should be focused far more on people capable of enacting change rather than "internet hobbyists" you've disparaged on more than one occasion. If you legitimately cared about such things in regards to creation of actual policy and laws, there's no reason not to do everything you can do to influence people who actually have the power to enact change.