Senator Warren still continues to say all the right things for me. As a Senator, or as a candidate for president. I've been let down by some of VP Harris' sound bites on immigration since January. I'm not like, "she's dead to me" clearly. She just could be better.
In a world where Sen Sinema exists... there's someone to save your ire for within the party.
But... Republicans have still been circling the wagons around a coup attempt and the domestic terrorists who tried to carry it out, so... y'know... I think it's safe to say which party's hands we're safer in.
X-Books Forum Mutant Tracker/FAQ- Updated every Tuesday.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/...tores-80500845
Does California NOT have bigger things to worry about?California on Saturday became the first state to say large department stores must display products like toys and toothbrushes in gender-neutral ways, a win for LGBT advocates who say the pink and blue hues of traditional marketing methods pressure children to conform to gender stereotypes.
The new law, signed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, does not outlaw traditional boys and girls sections at department stores. Instead, it says large stores must also have a gender neutral section to display “a reasonable selection" of items "regardless of whether they have been traditionally marketed for either girls or for boys.”
What stuff was off limits to her??????Low said he was inspired by the 10-year-old girl daughter of one of his staffers, who asked her mom why certain items in the store were “off limits” to her because she was a girl.
Kamala Harris is the heavy favorite to be the Democratic party's next nominee, just because that's the way it typically goes (Biden is the ultimate proof of the power of the vice-presidency as a springboard for a presidential bid) in addition to the party's sensitivity on identity issues making it really hard for someone to win a primary over a woman of color elected to national office.
But if she doesn't have a prominent enough role in the administration, is it Biden's fault? He can't make her popular or successful. That's on her.
I don't know if these are the best ways to determine the quality of governance. There are a lot of other factors involved.
Some of the "good" states are red (Nebraska, Utah, North Dakota) and some of the "bad" states are blue (New Mexico, Nevada, Hawaii.)
The people also matter. Just consider the likely results if everyone in Connecticut and Oklahoma (picking a "good" state and a "bad" state with relatively similar populations) swapped places except for elected officials.
An additional complicating factor is the leadership in the states. Some of the "good" blue states have Republican Governors (Massachusetts, New Hampshire), while some of the "bad" red states have Democratic Governor (Louisiana, Kentucky.)
It's also worth noting that some of the red states that you suggest were poorly governed had state legislatures and Governor's mansions controlled by Democrats until relatively recently, though I wouldn't say that's the reason for the outcomes. Democrats controlled the Kentucky state house until 2016, the Mississippi state house until 2012, the West Virginia House of Delegates until 2014, the Louisiana state house until 2008, and the Arkansas state house until 2012.
I may have asked this question before, but what do you think should be the policy when it comes to immigration?
What kind of border enforcement do you support? What should be done with undocumented immigrants? What limits should there be on legal immigration?
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets
There came a time when the Old Gods died! The Brave died with the Cunning! The Noble perished locked in battle with unleashed Evil! It was the last day for them! An ancient era was passing in fiery holocaust!
But the election was close.
Biden's margin in Georgia was 0.23% (11,779 votes) His margin in Arizona was 0.31% (10,457 votes) and his margin in Wisconsin was 0.63% (20,682 votes.) A national swing of less than a percent would've resulted in a Trump win. That wouldn't have taken much (IE- a better first debate performance when he was probably sick with Covid.)
You're a reasonably informed person, so you should be aware of this. So why should anyone take anything you say about lying seriously when you add insult to injury by lying about lying?
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets
Because pretending that's closer than it really is only furthers the motives of people in your party who fantasize about a Civil War and actually worked to start it on 1/6.
Try and not act surprised. I'm not that you miss that simple truth.
X-Books Forum Mutant Tracker/FAQ- Updated every Tuesday.
How about the response to COVID? You mean to tell me that wasn't incompetence?
Exactly that. I've mentioned this suspicion a couple of times here: the one thing Trump fears more than losing his wealth is losing his freedom, to which end, he'll willingly spend his last dollar to stay out of prison.
Avatar: Here's to the late, great Steve Dillon. Best. Punisher. Artist. EVER!
Feels like you are asking me how much time in jail we should be giving a prostitute.
While I feel like I've been a broken record about this, my answer is roughly "Well first off, I don't really think that a nation full of Johns is in any position to be talking about how much jail time a prostitute should be serving..."
Actually get serious about addressing the actual issues.
I'm glad Trump is gone, but he's gone because he lost. Not because Biden won. The common criticism of those on the right is that he can't be legitimate because almost nobody is truly enthusiastic about Biden on his own merits, but rather as an alternative to what came before him. They're right, but underestimate how much people disliked their guy.
Biden's best chance is if Trump runs again and actually follows through to the nomination rather than quitting once he's eked every dollar out of every MAGA sucker and basked in all of the attention the rallies bring. I'd still say right now it'd be close. If anyone else runs with any competence, again as things stand now (and it's a long time out), Biden likely loses.
Worst case scenario for us would be Biden retiring, they push Harris (who polled at around 1% in the primaries) as the nominee, and that perceived weakness ripples down the ticket and we see another four years of the Republicans having all branches and fully entrenching laws that keep them in power despite demographic shifts.
Yeah...
None of these folks on the other end would have had any interest in meeting with the person who is supposed to be taking the lead on this.
Never mind with that you'd better have a better excuse than that if you eventually have to attempt to explain away that nothing really got done after running on being the competent alternative.