Meh! I always dislike this arguement, it seems to be trying to give them an "out" for their behaviour. And it's insulting to the vast, VAST majority of good students who ALSO suffer those things, but don't behave badly. There is importance in understand why someone is how they are, that doesn't dissolve them of responsibility and blame. It's still a choice.
I don't see it as shuffling them out, more delivering the best environment for those that actual want to do well. Why should they suffer because one or two kids aren't being responsible? Why is doing the best for the majority disturbing? Why is protecting THEIR education as well, disturbing?
That's... a lot of ifs. We don't live in utopia, and this formula is impossible to guarantee replication across the country. Plus I don't think we should be requiring the kids to be solving this problem, that's a lot to ask.
I think we should set the bar higher than what Trump does, personally
There are numerous reasons a child could be disruptive, that doesn't give them a pass to act how they like with no consequence. Life and actions must have consequences, otherwise someone will never learn discipline.