Since this has already come up...
What's in blue is more what folks seem to want to make this about than what is actually going on.
Past that...
Never mind that anyone tossing around "Anonymous..." needs to take a minute to process the reality that the folks "Confirming..." her testimony(which, again is all second hand...) are every bit as "Anonymous..." as the folks who have said it never took place.
Long story short, it's still testimony that is almost entirely second hand about a story told by a person who is known to lie with no really clear cut reason why this is the one time we should believe he was not lying.
Again, it's might thin.