Beyond Impeachment, a Push for Ethics Laws That Do Not Depend on Shame
Among the changes embraced by House Democratic leaders are limits on the president’s pardon powers, mandated release of a president’s tax returns, new enforcement powers for independent agencies and Congress, and firmer prohibitions against financial conflicts of interest in the White House.
“We kept on having to add to it as the administration engaged in new abuses,” said Representative Adam B. Schiff, Democrat of California and the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. “It’s a long list.”
We’ve talked about the desperate need for an ethics overhaul numerous times on this board. we’ve had to witness Trump trample through political norms and it’s obvious we can no longer assume a president will follow traditional decorum. You know, things like the transition of power, nepotism, not blatantly funneling tax payer money into your own business, and not destroying democracy and declare oneself dictator for life.
Last edited by Robotman; 01-12-2021 at 01:42 AM.
Same here, sadly. Republicans will circle the wagons and protect their own. For them, it's party over country, party over the Constitution, party over law and order, party over morality, party over family, party over EVERYTHING.
Well, SDNY is still waiting for Trump after he leaves office, but even then, if he goes to trial and is convicted of the crimes he's charged with, the chances of his going to prison are razor thin.
Avatar: Here's to the late, great Steve Dillon. Best. Punisher. Artist. EVER!
Covid diagnosis started coming in for the members of Congress that had to take shelter with GOP colleagues that refused to wear masks while locked down. I mean that was obvious that COVID cases were definelty going to come from the Riot. Its another angle that has trumps idiocy and the GOP assistants who supported it on their hands.
Now there are important votes coming up they might have to miss. Hopefully no one actually dies from it.
Melania Trump: Has No One Stopped to Think How the Capitol Hill Attack Affected ME?
In the five days since the violent attack on Capitol Hill, the country has heard nary a whisper from the first lady of the United States, Melania Trump. To be fair, the only reason we heard from her husband, Donald Trump, was because he reportedly hoped a half-hearted two-and-half-minute video 24 hours after the fact would help him avoid prosecution and being removed via the 25th Amendment, after the one in which he told the people who stormed the Capitol building “we love you” and “you’re very special” didn’t cut it. Also to be fair, she was in a uniquely awkward position, given the fact that her husband had incited the violence in the first place, and her condemning it would be like if he flew into the Twin Towers on 9/11 and then she denounced the people responsible for the tragedy. Still, the nation expects certain things from the first couple, one of them being the crazy notion that they should be there to provide comfort to the country in times of great tragedy. And so on Monday, Melania, or someone in her office, put pen to paper, and shared her thoughts on the events of January 6, 2021, coming up with…an extremely unique take on what transpired!First off, she doesn’t actually reference the insurrection that occurred in her husband‘s name until the fourth paragraph of the statement, at which point she says her “heart goes out” to the people who died. Next, she says that she is “disappointed and disheartened with what happened last week.” So far, so good. But if you thought what she was disappointed and disheartened about was the insurrection caused by her husband that led to literal bloodshed, you thought wrong! What she’s actually teed off about is what she perceives as…attacks on Melania Trump, writing: “I find it shameful that surrounding these tragic events there has been salacious gossip, unwarranted personal attacks, and false misleading accusations on me—from people who are looking to be relevant and have an agenda. This time is solely about healing our country and its citizens. It should not be used for personal gain.”Hilariously, while most people might assume she was referring to the wholly warranted reporting about what she was doing during the attacks (overseeing a photo shoot) and her reaction to them (according to reporter Kate Bennett, she was asked if she had plans to issue “a statement of calm” or a plea to stop the violence and she declined, her “disinterest in addressing the country…indicative of being ‘checked out’”), or that her chief of staff, Stephanie Grisham, quit, the first lady, reports Maggie Haberman, was steamed about an op-ed written by her former pal Stephanie Winston Wolkoff.Oh, also, apparently the section where the first lady goes through the motions of expressing words of comfort was plagiarized from one of her previous speeches, because providing solace is hard:
Original join date: 11/23/2004
Eclectic Connoisseur of all things written, drawn, or imaginatively created.
I’m sure people felt sorry for Melania in the beginning as it was clear she wanted nothing to do with following in the footsteps of Michelle Obama, perhaps THE most accomplished First Lady since Jackie, given her, ahem, sketchy background as a topless model and college dropout. Everyone saw Melania as nothing more than a golddigger, brainless arm candy for a billionaire and had been put into a role she was woefully unprepared for, and I’ll admit that was my opinion on her as well. But, she wasted no time debasing everyone of the opinion she was an innocent waif in woods, from plagiarizing Michelle Obama’s speech at the 2016 RNC, her infamous “I Don’t Care” coat, the “I hate Chreestmas” rant and more, Melania has shown herself to be every bit as repellent and repugnant as her loathsome husband. The sooner she’s relieved of her duties as First Lady, the better.
Avatar: Here's to the late, great Steve Dillon. Best. Punisher. Artist. EVER!
About 10-15 years ago, some were calling for the internet to be treated as a public utility. The idea got pretty well smothered by free-marketers, but a quick google will show you that discussion is back with a roar. I can't help thinking that prospect (along with officials using words like "monopoly") has the big platforms in a bit of a sweat, and feeling some urgency to clean things up a bit.
I"m sorry to hear that Beastie. Didn't BB have a mental health thread around here, or are you thinking we need something distinct from that?
As I recall it, The Governator's ascension had a bit of flukeyness to it. His predecessor, Gray Davis got axed in a recall vote, mainly powered by something that wasn't his fault: the California Electricity Crisis, brought on by a pack of free-wheeling energy company's policies. Now, make no mistake, Schwarzenegger's celebrity was definitely an asset, but I'm not so sure he could have climbed that hill had California not been in such mess at the time.
I mean the idea that anyone in the Trump family or in his orbit could be moderating voices or influences was always absurd. People wondered if Ivanka would be a Trump-whisperer because she seemed to have more moderate views (in that she acknowledged climate change was a thing) but that was always an absurd proposition.
Donald Trump all through his life has been a profoundly evil man. Whether it's the housing segregation of the '70s, that Ad against the Central Park Five in the '80s, his general personal corruption, possibly being a serial rapist (given the number of accusations and allegations on him), a friend of Jeffrey Epstein, and of course the unforgivable Birther-attempt, he was and is evil. If his family backed him through all of that, then they will back him through anything. They are all corrupt and complicit.