It would have to be the moderators promoting a safe community.
I would feel that would be perhaps a big ask considering we're watching a former moderator argue why it's acceptable and not a toxic environment for people to spread known falsehoods and conspiracy theories for political purposes in spite of the very recent American history that shows why that's not the case. And then when called out for it, try a rubber/glue method to accuse their political opposite numbers of doing the same, without establishing a single actual conspiracy theory.
It's especially sad that this same individual also likes to dismiss the arguments of others by claiming they're in "bad faith", as they argue in favor of the worst faith arguments being an acceptable part of discourse.