Originally Posted by
CSTowle
While there may be some people who are making the claims you're arguing against in the bolded part, the majority of those on the left who are looking out for the voting rights of minorities who traditionally vote Democratic are not saying that all or most of those minorities are having their rights taken away. Just that a substantial number of them are, and in clear ways such as removal of polling places in the areas that vote Democratic, mass rejection of mail-in ballot applications among that population, and a push for Voter ID while knowing (and having been admitted to openly by the occasional Republican on mic to their core audience, which is pretty brazen) that the population least likely to have one is most likely to vote straight-ticket D.
As was shown last election you don't need to eliminate the minority vote in order to swing Congress and the Presidency, in some cases you don't even need to swing it more than a percentage of the overall vote. You know this, we know this, the Republican Party sure as hell knows this (it's the entire reason they're so motivated to do it). So knocking the heck out of some strawman "not all minority votes are infringed" is entirely beside the point. Which is voter suppression, and of a group of people historically suppressed in their ability to participate in society, the economy, politics, education, etc. Because picking on those without power is the easiest thing to do when you're a sociopath and don't care who gets hurt as long as you get your way. Republicans have been all about that since Nixon's Southern Strategy, and they're just continuing to double/triple down on this.
I occasionally cringe over things my party does, but I can't imagine what it would be like to support a party that does this election after election so on some level I sympathize with you trying to do your best to rationalize continuing to support them. But if you're going to do so you need to own what they're doing and why they're doing it, and not making the case that because they're not doing it to the extent that they'd like to (yet) it means everything's aces and it's just politics. It's not. We've gone beyond that, and even the suppression of minority rights isn't the worst thing your party is doing. That would be attempting to undermine the legitimacy of elections in general and the US federal government in particular in order to try to weaken it to the point where they can dominate smaller slices of the pie at the expense of the whole because they know they're not going to be able to have a shot at the whole pie with changing demographics.
On the topic of "race traitors", that sounds too much like KKK talk to me to be comfortable using the term. However, the Republican Party has made a killing over the decades by convincing people to vote against their own economic interest in order to hold onto guns that aren't going anywhere and having a say in what a woman does with her body when it's none of their d##n business so it's no surprise to me if a black, female, or LGBTQ+ voter decides to vote against their overall well-being and standing as a human being in pursuit of a wedge/culture issue or economic one. The reason why MLK Jr's family tends to speak on behalf of the Republican Party is abortion, and Log Cabin Republicans tend to be well-off and are willing to take the tax cut even if it means remaining second-class citizens in other areas. I don't call my relatives who support Trump "class traitors" for voting against their own economic interest, I just call them foolish. I'd say the same of the Bonginos and Larry Elders of the world.