Yes, it is a reputable paper, which is why I said more than once that there was no shame in admitting that you got duped by a one sided article as it's normally fair to assume that its a good source. In this case it wasn't, it was making an issue where there wasn't one as hot headed writer with a history of acting poorly online facing consequences for her latest poor choice of words is pretty much the definition of a nothingburger rather than a newsworthy "controversy".