Why is a week about respecting the LGBT among us something that must be opposed by anyone? Is there any evidence at all that these activities are being used to actively influence children to change their sexual preferences? I'm not even sure they should have one at first grade/well before puberty.
As I've pointed out before, complaining about or refusing to support Trump when you defend or support those who support him does nothing and means nothing in the long run, but the goalpost here was congressional leadership. Have you criticized them even in a response more than once or twice since Obama was elected? Because from the shouted "You Lie!" and before there have been many elected folks on the GoP side to accuse those they disagree with directly of lying and insult them before/during/after. Far more than Nancy Pelosi, but it was her that got you so upset you had to post about it.I've written about a few of Trump's lies. Usually by the time I notice it, someone else will have brought it up.
Because of the political leanings, I usually don't need to inform people of arguments against Republican leadership. But when Democratic leadership lies and disparages people, it's a topic you guys are either unaware of or not inclined to bring up.
I have no idea what this means, could you please clarify?The discussion would have been faster if it just had been agreement. But once there's disagreement, we're going to have more posts on a topic. There's noting wrong with this, but it means that reasonable people can defend are more likely to be discussed than things that no one reasonable would support.
And responding to your use of the word Girls I used Boys and then you went on about my word use instead and haven't brought up anything but mentions of this study which seems to be the only real thing that informs your opinion on young females transitioning at a rate FAR more than young males.The quote I used "the number of students brought up as girls identifying as transgender" is an accurate description, regardless of whether you think they were brought up correctly or incorrectly.
I'm sympathetic on the difficulty of referring to correct terminology on these issues. That was all.
There is one conservative view regarding CRT (the pervasive boogeyman that the guy who caused it to become mainstream has admitted they are trying to use as an umbrella to collect every liberal idea under to vilify and has been shown to spread misinformation about on many occasions) and that view is it's everywhere and influences decisions in most schools across the country. This is a view that you yourself have put forward and defended without any proof whatsoever when asked to provide it.With history, many conservatives will just group that under reading and writing. It's something people read about and write about.
There isn't one conservative view and there isn't one progressive view, which complicates arguments on the sensitive and important questions of what minors should be taught at school when it comes to sensitive topics.
Another is regardless of whether they believe in Evolution or not, that children in school should be able to question it and claim that their religious beliefs trump evidence without any sort of actual study or proof. Regardless of whether a few older students might have put in the time to I'm fairly sure that any kids in elementary school were handed this argument by their parents to regurgitate at the teachers and that is wrong.
And there is the one coming out that any mention of LGBT in schools should be eliminated, which is becoming more and more popular despite it being clear bigotry and not being rallied against by good GoP voters/legislators/pundits who decide things based on their morals and object to folks like Trump.