On this date in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, as well as 2021, “Fanatical Republican Extremist of the Day”posted profiles of the current U.S. House Representative for West Virginia’s’ 2nd District, Alex Mooney, who we noted had carpetbagged his way across the Maryland border after serving for years as a state legislator, and waiting in vain for former U.S. House Rep. Roscoe Bartlett to retire, eventually just getting annoyed enough to move to West Virginia and try to run for office there. During his time as a Maryland state legislator, though, Mooney became synonymous with the issue of LGBTQ rights, and his extreme opposition to them. At one point during a 1999 debate on hate crime legislation, Mooney sarcastically asked if people who commit beastiality should also be protected under the law, and in 2008, during a debate on same sex marriage, went as far as to claim its legalization would lead to the gay community "oppressing" religious figures and they would be "coming for the children". Mooney also has pushed for legislation to allow the display of religious monuments in public buildings (which is a violation of the Establishment clause of the First Amendment that guarantees a separation of church and state), considers any compromise on immigration to be amnesty, and speaks publicly about "gun-grabbers and pro-abortion zealots" (because that's totally the direction things have trended the past six years or so in our country). In September of 2015, Mooney also took to the floor of the House to give a speech where he accused Planned Parenthood of harvesting “baby parts” based on lies from the Center for Medical Progress, so there’s that, as well.
Now, we’re going to go ahead and lead our further discussion of Alex Mooney by pointing out that on March 28th, 2018, Alex Mooney recycled an idea from the Ron Paul school of thought regarding the American economy… he wanted to go back to the gold standard, and actually introduced legislation to try to make it a reality.
Now, if that doesn’t mean anything to you, it’s because the United States hasn’t used the gold standard since 1971. That’s right, we’re fifty years past we were on the gold standard. And guess what? Some folks in the 1980s were whispering in Ronald Reagan’s ear about doing this, and guess what they determined? Doing that would cripple not just the American economy, but the global economy. Yet every now and then, some hard right goofball from the Libertarian wing of the GOP starts flogging that dead horse to see if it will come back to life, even though almost 100% of economists oppose doing it, and it’s thought of as part of the reason it was so hard for the United States to recover from the Great Depression..
X-Books Forum Mutant Tracker/FAQ- Updated every Tuesday.
Suit challenging N.J. ballot system dominated by party leaders can move forward, judge rules
A federal lawsuit seeking to abolish New Jersey’s primary ballot system — casually known as “the county line” — can proceed, a judge ruled this week, setting up a closely watched court case that could upend one of the state’s most unique and controversial political traditions.
Six former candidates and the New Jersey Working Families Alliance, a progressive advocacy group, filed the suit last year against a group of county clerks, claiming the system is unfair, undemocratic, and unconstitutional.The clerks filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, but U.S. District Court Judge Zahid Quraishi on Tuesday rejected the request.
In other states, those seeking office simply run in the primary for their party’s nomination, and the winner represents the party in the general election.It is true, that's how it's done. Only, it's not true that it is mostly white men who choose, at least not for the Democrats.But in 19 of New Jersey’s 21 counties, local party leaders choose which candidates get to run “on the line” in primaries. That means those candidates’ names are bracketed together prominently on ballots alongside others who received the party’s endorsement. Contenders who don’t receive “the line” — often challengers seeking to unseat incumbents — are placed elsewhere on the ballot, often on their own.
Last edited by Tami; 06-03-2022 at 06:02 PM.
Original join date: 11/23/2004
Eclectic Connoisseur of all things written, drawn, or imaginatively created.
David McCormick conceded the Pennsylvania Qpublican Senate primary to Dr. Oz, nearly a month after the election ended because the voting between them was razor thin. That makes two lackeys who got support from Trump that won elections in my state along with Doug Mastriano who got the GQP nod for the governor’s race in November. I worry more about Mastriano who’s a straight up lunatic who’s on record saying a woman’s right to choose was, in so many words, nonsense and, by the way, was part of the mob that was outside the Capitol on 1/6. Yo, WBE, you should have this guy in the queue.
Avatar: Here's to the late, great Steve Dillon. Best. Punisher. Artist. EVER!
And, after he won re-election in 2020 with 63% of the vote, let’s just say Mooney has yet to dial back his extremism:
- January 27th, 2019: Alex Mooney voted against HJR 30, which was meant to express disapproval of Donald Trump not acting against Russian Federation for attacking our democracy. You see, he’s fine with our nation being sublet to Vladimir Putin.
- January 23rd, 2019: Rep. Mooney voted against HR 648, because he was gleefully enjoying the longest government shutdown in history.
- February 28th, 2019: Alex Mooney votes against HR 1112, a bill which would have required universal background checks on all firearm purchases, and close the gun show loophole.
- March 14th, 2019: Rep. Mooney votes against HJR 46, which sane members of Congress voted for to reject Donald Trump’s “national emergency” regarding the U.S. border and his attempts to reallocate funds for a border wall without Congressional approval.
- April 4th, 2019: Alex Mooney is one of 158 Republicans who choose to vote against the re-authorization of the Violence Against Women Act, likely because they feel the 2nd Amendment remaining absolute is more important than preventing people with a history of domestic abuse from owning a firearm (which statistics show, makes them more likely to use those firearms against women in their lives).
- May 17th, 2019: Mooney votes against The Equality Act, which would have prevented discrimination towards Americans based on their gender identity or sexual orientation.
- June 4th, 2019: Rep. Mooney votes against the Dreamers Act, because he’s too xenophobic and partisan to care about immigration reform.
- July 16th, 2019: Alex Mooney votes against a resolution to condemn Donald Trump for his racist statements that four people of color in Congress should “go back where they came from”.
- October 17th, 2019: Rep. Mooney is one of 60 Republicans who vote against HJ Res 77, which opposed Donald Trump’s disastrous decision to abandon Syrian Kurdish forces in Northeast Syria to the mercies of a Turkish invasion.
- October 23rd, 2019: Mooney is one of 41 Republicans who, while staring down the possibility of Donald Trump being impeached, stage a ridiculous publicity stunt in response by crashing a classified impeachment inquiry hearing for a “protest”.
- December 18th, 2019: Rep. Mooney ignores his Congressional duty to hold a president who has been proven to commit high crimes and misdemeanors accountable and votes against the first impeachment of Donald Trump.
- May 15th, 2020: Mooney votes against the HEROES Act, to further support the healthcare industry and citizens affected by the Covid-19 pandemic.
- December 10th, 2020: Mooney signs his name to an amicus brief to the Supreme Court, begging them to overturn the results of the 2020 election. The same election that she won re-election in.
- January 6th, 2021: Alex Mooney votes for the objection to the electoral college’s votes in the 2020 election, a failure to send any sort of message that he wasn’t intimidated or sympathetic to those who attacked the Capitol to attempt a violent coup.
- January 13th, 2021: Rep. Mooney votes against the second impeachment of Donald Trump, because the Republican Party no longer feels like they should be accountable for anything, including failed coups that result in the deaths of both their participants and police officers.
- February 4th, 2021: Alex Mooney votes to keep Marjorie Taylor Greene’s committee assignments, because he wouldn’t want her to be accountable for all the bigoted remarks and conspiracy theories she’s spread online (probably because she’s a kindred spirit).
- February 25th, 2021: Mooney votes against HR 5, the latest version of the Equality Act, that would provide workplace protections for LGBTQ Americans.
- March 3rd, 2021: Rep. Mooney votes against HR 1, a bill created to prevent the corruption of money in politics, and protect voter access to the ballot box.
- March 3rd, 2021: Alex Mooney votes against the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021.
- March 10th, 2021: Mooney votes against the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, because he feels people deserve to die in poverty during a pandemic.
- March 17th, 2021: Rep. Mooney votes against the re-authorization of the Violence Against Women Act, likely because they feel the 2nd Amendment remaining absolute is more important than preventing people with a history of domestic abuse from owning a firearm (which statistics show, makes them more likely to use those firearms against women in their lives).
- May 19th, 2021: Alex Mooney votes against HR 3233 the creation of a commission to investigate the Capitol Attack.
- May 20th, 2021: Mooney is one of 63 Republicans who vote against the Covid-19 Hate Crimes Act.
- November 5th, 2021: Alex Mooney votes against HR 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
- March 31st, 2022: Mooney votes against HR 6833, the Affordable Insulin Now Act, which would limit the cost that drug companies could list insulin at to $35 and make sure no diabetic was priced out of surviving their condition. Bill Johnson would rather they be gouged by pharmaceutical giants and/or die.
- May 18th, 2022: Alex Mooney is one of 192 Republicans who vote against HR 7790, to create supplemental funding for infant formula (while claiming to be pro- life).
- May 18th, 2022: Rep. Mooney votes against HR 350, the Domestic Violence Prevention Act, because these days, a plank of the Republican Party is ostensibly domestic terror.
- May 19th, 2022: Mooney votes against HR 7688, a bill which would help prevent gas companies from gouging customers on prices.
We thought Alex Mooney might be in a bit of trouble headed into the 2022 elections, even though his district is one of the reddest in the country… and that’s because the three West Virginia Republicans holding House seats had to play musical chairs, what with the state’s population radically dropping enough that it lost a Congressional seat. Alas, Mooney defeated U.S. House Rep. David McKinley in the primary for the new WV-2, accusing McKinley of being a RINO because he… voted for the Infrastructure Bill.
We need to go get a stiff drink.
X-Books Forum Mutant Tracker/FAQ- Updated every Tuesday.
X-Books Forum Mutant Tracker/FAQ- Updated every Tuesday.
N.Y. Republican Drops Re-Election Bid After Bucking His Party on Guns
In the wake of deadly mass shootings in Buffalo and Uvalde, Texas, Representative Chris Jacobs of New York, a congressman serving his first full term in the House, stunned fellow Republicans by embracing a federal assault weapons ban and limits on high-capacity magazines.
Speaking from his suburban Buffalo district a week ago, about 10 miles from the grocery store where 10 Black residents were slaughtered, Mr. Jacobs framed his risky break from bedrock Republican orthodoxy as bigger than politics: “I can’t in good conscience sit back and say I didn’t try to do something,” he said.
It took only seven days for political forces to catch up with him.
On Friday, facing intense backlash from party leaders, a potential primary from the state party chairman and a forceful dressing down from Donald Trump Jr., Mr. Jacobs announced that he would abandon his re-election campaign.
Original join date: 11/23/2004
Eclectic Connoisseur of all things written, drawn, or imaginatively created.
Because you want to rush through an inspection for a company that produces food for babies. If some children became ill afterward who'd be the person taking the heat?
Besides, it's not the President's job to make sure an independently owned company is keeping up with its inspections. A better question might be how actually messed up is that company that they had to stop production for an extended period?
The Cover Contest Weekly Winners ThreadSo much winning!!
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis
“It’s your party and you can cry if you want to.” - Captain Europe
Avatar: Here's to the late, great Steve Dillon. Best. Punisher. Artist. EVER!
Um? It's the formula company that is responsible to fix their egregious violations.
Abbott baby formula plant had ‘egregiously unsanitary’ conditions, FDA chief says in scathing testimony to Congress
Or did you think the government runs the plant. Or should they just let babies have tainted formula?? You really are too much 30.
As to who is responsible, besides the company,.
https://www.newsweek.com/baby-formul...-usmca-1708188
But you could never blame Trump for anything, not when there is a chance to hit Biden.Trump bears much of the blame for the current shortage of baby formula in the U.S, since his Administration's USMCA free trade agreement has made it virtually IMPOSSIBLE for our country to import infant formula from Canada
Last edited by Kirby101; 06-03-2022 at 07:23 PM.
There came a time when the Old Gods died! The Brave died with the Cunning! The Noble perished locked in battle with unleashed Evil! It was the last day for them! An ancient era was passing in fiery holocaust!
The best question would be something like...
"Isn't contending with this sort of thing the entire reason that government at the 'Federal...' level even exists?..."
Politely?
You are the one framing this in terms of "Rush Through..."
Meanwhile, out in actual reality?
A company that seemingly has something pretty close to an "Anti-Trust..." share of the market was put on notice in the second month of this year...
If government at the "Federal..." level is not addressing this sort of thing in a time frame that is not setting up a shortage?
(Never mind addressing the market share that the company in question seems to have...)
A person has to ask themselves why said government at the "Federal..." level only got off of it's figurative butt once it might cost them something at the ballot box.
Noticed that you left something pretty obvious out...
Quite often?Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer also backed limits on Canada's exports of dairy products in order to help farmers hit by the pandemic depend on "stable and fair rules to compete equitably in the nearby Canadian market."
"Both Sides..." ain't just something that folks would like to avoid talking about.
Past that...
The idea that government at the "Federal..." level has right around "Zero..." pressure to exert when it comes to this sort of thing is just kind of a mind blower.
It's like some of you are making a pretty brilliant argument for that Federal government is largely useless when you should be wondering why it isn't really doing what it should be.