Originally Posted by
CSTowle
Couple of things, one also applying to the quote below, didn't say that communism was the better way to go. Just that capitalism and the greed factor is why we don't care as much about updating infrastructure or making public places safe after knowing about the dangers of asbestos for decades.
Both can be bad, and I went out of my way to point out the bad under communism (again to address both quotes here). As far as success, depends on your definition. The USSR collapsed, but they also spent decades being undermined at every turn by the West. China is the world's second largest economy, and Cuba and Vietnam seem to be doing alright. At least compared to their neighbors.
Some might say, "well China is only successful because they're exploited by big business in the capitalist Western world". True, because both are s##tty systems. Our greed has led to gutting our manufacturing base. If it wasn't communist China it would have been India, or Africa, or somewhere else with a large enough population able to be exploited (still may end up that way).
Are we really the success story when our wealth was born from the extraction of the wealth, resources, and dignity of people too weak to fight back across the world for centuries continuously and to this day? I guess. If Catlady thinks that desperate people going where the resources are is a sign of our success, I guess. Of a type.
But you only have to look at the other countries in our hemisphere and our treatment, resource extraction, and political interference to see what chance anyone has when they're not even left alone to try and establish themselves. Then we get mad when they come here.
On communism/capitalism, see the above. First bolded: The economy isn't everything, but for most people it's the first thing. It's the thing to worry about first, putting food on your kid's table and having gas to get around and heat your home, and everything else. Without those things people will tend to care a lot less about other issues, and will be much more susceptible to bulls##t if the bulls##t promises them better times ahead. It is damned foolish to dismiss those concerns.
Second bolded: To my points above, so is capitalism. They're just less transparent about it, and again are willing to exploit the cheap labor in communist countries if that helps the bottom line. They've just learned the lesson I addressed in my first comment, that if people feel secure they're less likely to have an uprising. It's also easier to distract people with entertainment when you're not concerned with censoring anything critical of the government/State and instead simply filter it out at the source as not being "marketable". Subtle, smarter, just as evil (but hey, you get cool stuff!).
Third bolded: And I would like to say I wouldn't have expected such a condescending answer from a person who disagrees with Republicans, but honestly it's exactly what I'd expect. It's also why when folks on the left ask the question, "Why aren't they listening to us?" I'd ask "Why aren't you listening to them? Why are you projecting the worst motivations on them? Why can't you recognize that people might disagree with you for legitimate reasons, and they're not voting Red out of confusion or racism or hatred of their fellow man but because they truly think Team Red has the best ideas or at least outcomes overall?"
The answer to all of those questions is because we need to think we're always right, and that too often means we need to think anyone who disagrees with us is always wrong. Even better would be if they were stupid, or fearful, or easily confused and better still would be if they were inhuman monsters whose needs, motivations, and arguments could be dismissed out of hand. That's a comforting thought, and doesn't require much thinking beyond it. Keeps one safely in that smug little bubble.