Classic conservative thinking. Teenagers are not mature enough to know what gender they identify as, or to know that they want/need to have an abortion, but they are at the same time mature enough to become parents.
Classic conservative thinking. Teenagers are not mature enough to know what gender they identify as, or to know that they want/need to have an abortion, but they are at the same time mature enough to become parents.
Slava Ukraini!Truth and love must prevail over lies and hatred
Words fail me to descibe this level of stupidity. Attenborough's documentaries are great, I hope it will be available on Netflix like the previous ones.
I hope everyone who violated HIPAA ends up being prosecuted. What a loathsome behavior.
I am wary of everything that comes from China, so I would never use TikTok even if I liked social media. (No, that's not racist, just being distrustful of a communist, authoritative regime.)
Slava Ukraini!Truth and love must prevail over lies and hatred
There's a case to be made for giving people the benefit of the doubt, or for asking for clarity of intent, or pondering what good legislative policy would be, or trying to correctly and precisely frame an argument or point or whatever just so - but more importantly there's a stronger case to call out transphobia when confronted with it. When, by all your many myriad points and counterpoints and arguments and clarifications and wanting things to be as exactingly precise as possible, is the case strong enough for you to feel the need to call out the transphobia running strongly through the ethos of your party?
These tactics are too familiar at this point.
We actually deal with requests for records, and they refresh us on HIPAA yearly on things we cannot do. Looking up patient's info without reason, copying the information without reason, and revealing that information to any unauthorized source are each individual breaches and so punishable under HIPAA. I don't even write down the occasional first name or last name like I used to in Phone work for RPG Character name purposes.
I agree on the documentary, on HIPAA, and the wariness of a government well known for misinformation.
I'd not hold my breath if I were you.
Yeah, consistently abominable. When I was 17, all I thought about was hanging out with my buddies and working hard to graduate high school, not wondering how I’m going to raise a kid after getting a girl two years my junior pregnant. If Boobert was truly a responsible parent, she would’ve warned her son about the perils of unprotected sex and the consequences of same, not REWARD what he had done after the fact. That makes her a suck ass mother, just like she’s a suck ass politician.
Avatar: Here's to the late, great Steve Dillon. Best. Punisher. Artist. EVER!
How much you wanna bet she tried really hard to bully the kid into having an abortion?
And yet some people are having a hard time discerning my point.
Like they want to engage in highly technical arguments or something as a distraction from the fact that they themselves are overly credulous to a privileged dork ass loser like Jesse Singal.
(Singal himself did not violate HIPAA, I *think*, but his source evidently did so, at least judging by his own description of her activities in apparently accessing files she had no reason to access. I do not believe it will be enforced. Her actions are problematic even when shown in the best light and her extraordinary claims are absolutely fucking dubious, and broadcasting them without doing real due diligence in a time of inflammatory rhetoric explicitly against trans youth is the height of journalistic malpractice.)
Last edited by Tendrin; 03-11-2023 at 08:46 PM.
A good break down on how HIPAA works in regards to Reed and whether or not she qualifies for whistleblower protection:
https://twitter.com/BadHippa/status/1634642545253957632
Another good descriuption of the whole thing:
esse Singal has what he believes is strong evidence that the “whistleblower” whose story he desperately wishes were true because it would prove a culture war talking point is on the level. It…is not:https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com...iors-unchangedo Signal asked a prominent TERF if Reed’s story seemed credible, and Anderson cited 1)someone who was admittedly joking, and 2)some secondhand rumors. In terms of support for Reed’s story, this is less than nothing. Reed is also still not providing any independent corroboration. So as it stands now there are more than a dozen corroborating witnesses saying that there was nothing bad going on at the clinic, and zero corroborating witnesses for Reed’s claim that children — including those who allegedly identified as mushrooms and attack helicopters — were rushed into gender treatments without parental consent. As of now, it’s not a close call and Singal’s blog changes nothing.
Last edited by Tendrin; 03-11-2023 at 08:54 PM.
Here is an example of how Reed's story is shifting from her under oath affidavit.
https://twitter.com/christapeterso/s...57409459732480
You'd have to be stupid to believe that they just rushed the 'attack helicopter' kid onto hormones.
The thing is, basic due diligence as a journalist would have avoided a lot of this.
(Frankly a lot of the stuff and how it's being treated in the press stinks of the pro-life movement tactics against abortion clinics.)
Last edited by Tendrin; 03-11-2023 at 10:50 PM.