Getting radicalized off the internet cuts across class lines and social backgrounds, and ideologies.
Not to be rude...but they can afford guns, right? And the really dangerous guns like assault rifles and machine guns.In the 1970's a kid could be a high school drop out and get a good union paying job with the UAW, now he's lucky if he can get a job at all let alone working at the mini mart.
This smacks of the Columbine shooter sympathy narrative which can be hard. The columbine shooters were fetishized as these bullied kids going nuts when it turns out they were white supremacist jackasses who were pretty extroverted and social, and were bullies themselves. That started the "bullied kid=shooter" narrative which if anything increased bullying.
It's a problem across class lines.I am aware that bigotry has always been a long standing cultural problem amongst blue collar workers,
Remember that the vast majority of Trump's support actually came from middle class white people. The narrative about working class Trump voters was significantly exaggerated and unrepresentative.
The KKK existed in the 19th Century and was revived in the 20th Century, you had many white supremacist gangs and terrorist incidents with them in American history....but the rise of right wing extremism and opioid addiction didn't set in until globalization,
This narrative doesn't work.
America's economy was at its height in the 1960s, and yet that was the era of political mobilization across the spectrum and a lot of movements on the fringe, both right and left...so again this idea that good economics creates peace doesn't work.Good paying jobs builds strong communities and keeps the political fringes to the margins where they belong.
In Norway, that psycho Anders Breivik was a product of a good social welfare system and yet he went out and massacred 100 kids on that island.
That too. But, as I said, openly expressing an opinion is not the same as leaking secret information. If Putin had publicly said he thought it would be better if Trump became the American President, there would be nothing wrong with him expressing his opinion. If he said he wanted Trump to win so Trump's secret deals with Russia would benefit them both, well, that would probably have backfired. Maybe Megan's opinion will influence a few people. Maybe mine will. But that's not influence by hijacking and leaking documents including possibly select documents designed for one purpose. Note Putin did not leak the information about Trump's secret business deals.
Power with Girl is better.
Saying that a morbidly obese man in his 70s with a likely drug problem and a very likely recent history of strokes has a "99 percent chance" of surviving covid is (a) factually wrong and (b) making the virus sound less dangerous than it is, which makes the statement dangerous.
"How does the Green Goblin have anything to do with Herpes?" - The Dying Detective
Hillary was right!
Trump tells Rush Limbaugh he 'might not have recovered' from COVID-19 without Regeneron antibody cocktail
Take this as you will.President Donald Trump on Friday indicated he was worried about his COVID-19 prognosis early on, telling the talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh that he thought an experimental antibody cocktail from Regeneron was what turned things around.
"I was in not great shape," Trump told Limbaugh, to whom he gave the nation's highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, in February.
But the president said he "recovered immediately, almost immediately." He added that he "might not have recovered at all from COVID" were it not for the antibody cocktail.
Original join date: 11/23/2004
Eclectic Connoisseur of all things written, drawn, or imaginatively created.
X-Books Forum Mutant Tracker/FAQ- Updated every Tuesday.
It would already be higher than that based on that he is the leader of a nation with ready access to treatment that the average element of said survival rate would not have.
Never mind that a lot of the "Contributing Factors..." in that post are only really serious contributing factors if we accept that someone on a comic book message board has some serious insight into Trump's actual health.
While it could be, I don't think that we actually have much that points to it being solid reality that we can calculate his "Actual..." chance based on.
Last edited by numberthirty; 10-09-2020 at 04:54 PM.
It would be factually wrong if he was poor but in this country being rich means better healthcare which means a much higher rate of survival. I don't get why you can't grasp that fact. And it is a fact, not an opinion.
Maybe if you weren't the sharpest crayon in box you'd see a statement like " There wasn't a high chance President Trump was going to die" and think the virus wasn't dangerous...but for most everybody else they understand it's merely a fact of the differences of wealth and influence on health care and realize the fact that he had a positive outcome means squat to their own chances.
Saw a thing:
Had the people who plotted to kidnap/assassinate Gretchen Whitmer been Muslim, Donald Trump would have touted his Muslim ban.
Had the people who plotted to kidnap/assassinate Gretchen Whitmer been Mexican, Donald Trump would have touted his border wall.
The people who plotted to kidnap/assassinate Gretchen Whitmer were white domestic terrorists, so Donald Trump attacked the Governor on Twitter.
This should tell you everything you need to know.
X-Books Forum Mutant Tracker/FAQ- Updated every Tuesday.
Also, while Trump f***s about on right-wing media to try and convince his followers he's "cured"...
There's still a category 2 hurricane hitting Louisiana right now that he probably should be more focused on.
X-Books Forum Mutant Tracker/FAQ- Updated every Tuesday.
Original join date: 11/23/2004
Eclectic Connoisseur of all things written, drawn, or imaginatively created.
Avatar: Here's to the late, great Steve Dillon. Best. Punisher. Artist. EVER!