Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456789 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 127
  1. #76
    CBR's Good Fairy Kieran_Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    8,499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Caivu View Post
    Yes. That's exactly why this whole thing is coming off so ridiculous: because Pattinson joking about being lazy during quarantine isn't about any kind of privilege at all. Do you think there aren't plenty of people who fall outside the categories you named who aren't also making the same kinds of jokes? Twitter is full of them, and that's been a fairly widespread reaction from what I've seen. So it's confusing to me why this is being treated as any kind of deal at all if the fact of his joking is known.
    Okay, thank-you for clearing that up. The reason it's privilege is rooted in several things:
    a) the fact he gets to treat interviews as a joke to give irreverent answers to shows his privilege... over many actresses, over non-Caucasian actors, over LGBT+ actors, who don't have such opportunity. Partly because they are interviewed less, partly because they can't afford to p*ss off anyone, on any level, with offensive attitudes (even if it wasn't intended as offensive, you'd be amazed how many people get upset about X, Y or Z). Now while these are sweeping statements, they are nonetheless grounded in reality. If he was a black actress, I guarantee he wouldn't have such a cavalier attitude to interviews he's PAID to do.
    b) the fact he acknowledges Zoë Kravitz is working out so much more is a very privileged ignorance. She has to; she's an actress, she has to. And his throw-away comments about it, while innocent, is still ignorance. Is still privileged, because as a man he has his body matter so much less than a woman's.

    Does this mean he's evil? NO! God no. Does it mean he's a jerk? Probably not. Does it make him likeable? No, why would it? At best it's a badly done joke, from a "frat boy-esq mind", who thinks the fact he gets to be so casual about his fame and work isn't rooted in protection due to his three fold privilege. At worst, he's telling the truth, and... ugh... that is unlikeable (and unprofessional). I'm not in the cancel culture, and truthfully I have no horse in this race (I wasn't intending to watch the film anyway). But I don't think it should be swept under the rug.

    Also... we're in isolation, we have nothing but time to debate such nonsense
    "We are Shakespeare. We are Michelangelo. We are Tchaikovsky. We are Turing. We are Mercury. We are Wilde. We are Lincoln, Lorca, Leonardo da Vinci. We are Alexander the Great. We are Fredrick the Great. We are Rustin. We are Addams. We are Marsha! Marsha Marsha Marsha! We so generous, we DeGeneres. We are Ziggy Stardust hooked to the silver screen. Controversially we are Malcolm X. We are Plato. We are Aristotle. We are RuPaul, god dammit! And yes, we are Woolf."

  2. #77
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    2,085

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sammy_hansen View Post
    Or do people hate (and I do mean hate in that they need to scream into the Internet void) Robert Pattinson that much?
    If Mr. Twilight is about to take on one of the biggest superhero roles and he doesn't behave with Zen-like professionalism or like he's found a new calling in life, but instead has fun about it, I can imagine people not familiar with him reacting a bunch of ways, from surprise to taking it personal.

    I guess that figures into why he does it. The final product will tell the only worthwhile story.

  3. #78
    Ultimate Member Riv86672's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    11,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sammy_hansen View Post
    The people who want Batman to be some sort of outlandish Jim Lee bodybuilder are the same people who’d want all female superheroes to look like David Finch Pornstars.
    I guess its easier to rebut arguments if you make the arguments up as you go?
    Because no one's been asking for any of that.
    PPL just think Pattinson should be in shape to play Batman, and gosh, golly by gum, dang it (pardon my French), thats not too much to expect.

  4. #79
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kieran_Frost View Post
    Okay, thank-you for clearing that up. The reason it's privilege is rooted in several things:
    a) the fact he gets to treat interviews as a joke to give irreverent answers to shows his privilege... over many actresses, over non-Caucasian actors, over LGBT+ actors, who don't have such opportunity. Partly because they are interviewed less, partly because they can't afford to p*ss off anyone, on any level, with offensive attitudes (even if it wasn't intended as offensive, you'd be amazed how many people get upset about X, Y or Z). Now while these are sweeping statements, they are nonetheless grounded in reality. If he was a black actress, I guarantee he wouldn't have such a cavalier attitude to interviews he's PAID to do.
    b) the fact he acknowledges Zoë Kravitz is working out so much more is a very privileged ignorance. She has to; she's an actress, she has to. And his throw-away comments about it, while innocent, is still ignorance. Is still privileged, because as a man he has his body matter so much less than a woman's.

    Does this mean he's evil? NO! God no. Does it mean he's a jerk? Probably not. Does it make him likeable? No, why would it? At best it's a badly done joke, from a "frat boy-esq mind", who thinks the fact he gets to be so casual about his fame and work isn't rooted in protection due to his three fold privilege. At worst, he's telling the truth, and... ugh... that is unlikeable (and unprofessional). I'm not in the cancel culture, and truthfully I have no horse in this race (I wasn't intending to watch the film anyway). But I don't think it should be swept under the rug.

    Also... we're in isolation, we have nothing but time to debate such nonsense
    That almost sounds like a joke... especially with the added emoji...


    But, seriously, which one is it? Are we discussing nonsense, or disgusting displays of racism and sexism from a privileged white male actor?



    There isn’t a teacup small enough for phoney storm.

  5. #80
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riv86672 View Post
    I guess its easier to rebut arguments if you make the arguments up as you go?
    Because no one's been asking for any of that.
    PPL just think Pattinson should be in shape to play Batman, and gosh, golly by gum, dang it (pardon my French), thats not too much to expect.
    And like I said before, do you know he is not in shape?


    And and people have been referring to all sorts of Batmans in this thread, evaluating and comparing body types, from Keaton to Affleck. And people have been saying they don’t want Batman to be thin, which the opposite I guess is big, which is closer to Jim Lee style. Which is closer to comics, closer to David Finch. Let’s not forget the people who said Gal Gadot’s boobs weren’t big enough, or Brie Larson’s butt wasn’t round enough. Sure, they may not be here on this thread - and I never said they were, buddy - but those people would be miffed and peeved by not huge Pattinson.
    Last edited by sammy_hansen; 05-15-2020 at 03:32 PM.

  6. #81
    CBR's Good Fairy Kieran_Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    8,499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riv86672 View Post
    I guess its easier to rebut arguments if you make the arguments up as you go?
    Because no one's been asking for any of that.
    Ding ding ding ding!

    Quote Originally Posted by Riv86672 View Post
    PPL just think Pattinson should be in shape to play Batman, and gosh, golly by gum, dang it (pardon my French), thats not too much to expect.
    It's not much to expect, agreed. It's also what the studio expects. No studio hires someone a personal trainer because they don't care about how the actor will look come filming. That's like a studio hiring a hair stylist for Yul Brynner... it does not compute.
    "We are Shakespeare. We are Michelangelo. We are Tchaikovsky. We are Turing. We are Mercury. We are Wilde. We are Lincoln, Lorca, Leonardo da Vinci. We are Alexander the Great. We are Fredrick the Great. We are Rustin. We are Addams. We are Marsha! Marsha Marsha Marsha! We so generous, we DeGeneres. We are Ziggy Stardust hooked to the silver screen. Controversially we are Malcolm X. We are Plato. We are Aristotle. We are RuPaul, god dammit! And yes, we are Woolf."

  7. #82
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kieran_Frost View Post
    Ding ding ding ding!


    It's not much to expect, agreed. It's also what the studio expects. No studio hires someone a personal trainer because they don't care about how the actor will look come filming. That's like a studio hiring a hair stylist for Yul Brynner... it does not compute.
    Do you actually know he is not in shape?

  8. #83
    CBR's Good Fairy Kieran_Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    8,499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sammy_hansen View Post
    Do you actually know he is not in shape?
    No. Do you know he is?
    "We are Shakespeare. We are Michelangelo. We are Tchaikovsky. We are Turing. We are Mercury. We are Wilde. We are Lincoln, Lorca, Leonardo da Vinci. We are Alexander the Great. We are Fredrick the Great. We are Rustin. We are Addams. We are Marsha! Marsha Marsha Marsha! We so generous, we DeGeneres. We are Ziggy Stardust hooked to the silver screen. Controversially we are Malcolm X. We are Plato. We are Aristotle. We are RuPaul, god dammit! And yes, we are Woolf."

  9. #84
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kieran_Frost View Post
    No. Do you know he is?
    No, of course not. But I’m not making accusations against him and his professionalism.

  10. #85
    Ultimate Member Riv86672's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    11,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kieran_Frost View Post
    No. Do you know he is?
    Exactly.

    And really, if he IS joking, then, as someone who in RL always goes for the joke, i can say that, sometimes jokes dont land.

    Of course, i dont have a bunch of ppl defending my bad jokes to the bitter end against those who didnt find them funny, that must me nice.

    I've never had that...privilege.

  11. #86
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riv86672 View Post
    Exactly.

    And really, if he IS joking, then, as someone who in RL always goes for the joke, i can say that, sometimes jokes dont land.

    Of course, i dont have a bunch of ppl defending my bad jokes to the bitter end against those who didnt find them funny, that must me nice.

    I've never had that...privilege.
    Just because you think the joke didn’t land or you don’t think it’s funny doesn’t mean that it’s not funny. That’s not how comedy works, dude.


    And it’s interesting how people are castigating someone so much about an actor in a film they are literally not intending to watch.
    Last edited by sammy_hansen; 05-15-2020 at 04:05 PM.

  12. #87

    Default

    In the end, we’re all pretty privileged to be able to...erm...discuss such a trivial topic on our fancy computer devices.

  13. #88
    Invincible Member numberthirty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    24,930

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riv86672 View Post
    I guess its easier to rebut arguments if you make the arguments up as you go?
    Because no one's been asking for any of that.
    PPL just think Pattinson should be in shape to play Batman, and gosh, golly by gum, dang it (pardon my French), thats not too much to expect.
    Honestly, a handful of people, on a comic book message board, think that.

    A few folks, even in this thread, have pointed out that it is largely a non-issue.

  14. #89
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bunch of Coconuts View Post
    In the end, we’re all pretty privileged to be able to...erm...discuss such a trivial topic on our fancy computer devices.
    Please, no jokes. Now is not the time.

  15. #90

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sammy_hansen View Post
    Please, no jokes. Now is not the time.
    I was actually being half-serious, but slapping myself 5 times after catching up on the thread may have...done things to me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •