I love spidey one of the best heroes in the world, but compared to supes, batman, captain america, ironman and wolverine, he falls short of being a mainly idolized man fantasy, and to much of a nerdy torture porn type. I think thats the problem spiderman, he has creators and writers who just wont develop him into any sucessful male empowerment who looked up to and always somehow failing and looking weak. Meanwhile, heroes like superman or captain america are the lynchpins of respect yet mature masculinity and ironman and wolverine are the shallow desires of masculinity and respect(especially to women) and i feel thats what makes them better heroes than spiderman, they fufill expectation for their target audience most of the time while peter has to be written as a neurotic or ooc loser as a part of his teenage/young adult appeal but ends up hurting his image as a character who mostly has writers screeing him over for some reason relating to manchild habits.

So who agrees, the peter parker concept is mostly undermined intentionally out of sheer contempt of the character to me when he deserves to be treated like one of the greatest heroes. Even other characters like spiderman are done better on other mediums because at least they keep the characters entertaining and desirable to the reader via finding some way to root for his struggles without whining or being a crybaby via angst. Like Dick Greyson or Beast Boy. Or hell even Naruto without the sasuke angst.