Originally Posted by
Zaresh
Yes, he has. He has established himself as an independent anti-hero, much like Dick did before him, even more than Tim did by the end of the post-Crisis chronology, where he was pretty independent himself. Not to the same level Batgirl operates yet (I honestly think she's the one that uses or needs Batman less). But still, independent enough. And operating with his own plans and methods, his own criteria. He usually choses when and how he involves himself or not. Or, well, he's meant to, I guess, by editorial, to be like that.
The only reason he's connected to the batfam is because he's a legacy character inside the batfam. And obviously inherits much of the mythos and connections in that franchise. Again, as it happens with every other legacy character in the batman franchise, being them heroes like Barbara or Tim, or arguable villains-depending-on-the-day like Harley. You'll never get a clear cut, they're all always being to some degree connected and dependant of the main batman. Heck, the whole DC universe is, at this point dependant of the Batman. You only have to see that they've pushed him even in the GL books (what's next? Aquaman?). It's ridiculous. Jason? When Rebith started, he wasn't even under the same editorial "brand" than the other batbooks. Yet he has had to deal with the big events and editorial changes when the first half of this Rebirth run was about to happen, changing the original plans for the book. And then it happened 10 issues later again, changing again the plans for the book then; and then it happened 7 issues later again. This, we know by rumours and throwaway lines and stuff. It's ridiculous. And it happened during New 52 too, I think. It's not the only one who has suffered this problem, but you can't denny his book has suffered from it. It's not victimizing; it's what it is.
Also, I hate events, with passion.
Nowhere I said he was. I know who are the big fishes in the editorial line, and Jason, despite being a favourite of not few people, he's relatively niche. Much like Deathstroke nowadays, but he has more fans than. let's see, Blue Beetle, one of my most liked. He's like Moon Knight in Marvel, but obviously with fewer history behind. Now, I want to ask, which character isn't subject to the whims of the new writer? Every one of them. Barbara herself is an example of how they can't decide what they want for her. And technically, Jason is a corporate owned character, as much as any of the others. Few of the characters from before the 90's are not, I think.
Almost as much an established cast as a character you know well, Damian, has during the same time (within 10 years I mean). Maybe more, because I would love to see some of the older ones again. More established and more in quantity than, again, Barbara has since Flashpoint (she has lost his old support cast, as far as I'm aware, or most of them). Honestly, I can't think of any character within DC with the same exposure that has gained many, but because I can lack of knowledge, I would like if someone could bring a few examples to the tab
The brands is just natural: he's a legacy character, he has clear ties to the bat brand, and it does pay saleswise. It's just logical and people identifies the red, angular bat with him (and the curvy one with Kate). I don't necessary like it, but I can see the logic behind it. The hood is just in his origin as a character at this point. It's like asking Venom to drop the white spider in his logo. It makes little sense and robs him of his roots. But he could try a new alias, that's something I would like to read. He needs a good reason to gain that new alias though: I hate when characters don't build a proper story behind their IDs.