Steven Seagal vs Liam Neeson

[CliffHanger2]

All movie fighter versions.

1st round-H2H

2nd round knife fight.

[MichaelC]

Steven Seagal likes to play Gary Stu's, but he aint Gary Stu enough to beat Zeus.

[The Chou Lives]

Yep. Also Steve has died in some of his roles. So not invincible either.

And yeah Lism is a Jedi Master and freakken Zeus.

[CliffHanger2]

Nah Zeus role is excluded. When I said fighter versions for Neeson I'm thinking Taken roles and stuff like that.

[Pendaran]

Neeson get Darkman for this?

[CliffHanger2]

Neeson get Darkman for this?

Wow I forgot about Darkman. Nah just his non-superhuman roles.

[FrenchGemini]

Still leaves him medieval armor as standard equipment as Sir Gawain from Excalibur, and being as good a fighter as Bale Batman (who, while he is one of Rumbles' main Butt Monkeys, is still pretty damn capable). Plus his feats from Taken and the like.

However I didn't watch Seagal's movies, aside from that one time he held his own for a bit against Mike Tyson (which is a pretty damn impressive special effect), so I can't give a clear cut answer right now.

[CliffHanger2]

Still leaves him medieval armor as standard equipment as Sir Gawain from Excalibur, and being as good a fighter as Bale Batman (who, while he is one of Rumbles' main Butt Monkeys, is still pretty damn capable). Plus his feats from Taken and the like.

However I didn't watch Seagal's movies, aside from that one time he held his own for a bit against Mike Tyson (which is a pretty damn impressive special effect), so I can't give a clear cut answer right now.

One example the first 3mins are just talking tho.

[The Chou Lives]

Still leaves him medieval armor as standard equipment as Sir Gawain from Excalibur, and being as good a fighter as Bale Batman (who, while he is one of Rumbles' main Butt Monkeys, is still pretty damn capable). Plus his feats from Taken and the like.

However I didn't watch Seagal's movies, aside from that one time he held his own for a bit against Mike Tyson (which is a pretty damn impressive special effect), so I can't give a clear cut answer right now.

The issue I am having is Seagal on his own movies comes across as invincible and none can touch him, except the two counts of his character dying, which both times was his own choice.

Machete and the o s with John Legsuzmo(?$”) and Kurt Russel.

[Blackid]

Sad thing is I believe the real fight would be between the film editor for Segal vs the editor for Neeson. lol

they would be sweating and trying their best to help the other one win. So...... Many..... Jump Cuts!

[Powerboy]

Wow I forgot about Darkman. Nah just his non-superhuman roles.

That should also eliminate most of Seagal's characters.

[Cody]

Steven Seagal only plays one role. Its just redone in several different themes. Seriously, the guy is almost always some sort of ex soldier gone cop beating up on mooks. Liam Neeson however plays characters who are essentially retired James Bonds or retired Jason Bournes who wreck nameless mooks as well as the occasional hardened mob boss.

I give the later the edge since he seems to be able to take a lot more than the former. And has an easier time downing people with his hands while Seagal can sometimes appear to have paper fist syndrome.

[CliffHanger2]

That should also eliminate most of Seagal's characters.

Yeah but it's nothing explicit per se like using the force or anything. Just hinted at.

[The Chou Lives]

One example the first 3mins are just talking tho.

Jesus he is unlikable af.

[CliffHanger2]

Jesus he is unlikable af.

LOL. C'mon the guy's a sweetheart lol.