Originally Posted by
gregpersons
It's contextual, and it's a cultural threshold. Batman '89 was considered extremely dark. You look at it now, it looks like it's just the goth'd up reboot of the Adam West show, same as Tim Burton's approach to Alice in Wonderland or Dumbo.
The Nolan films were never especially violent. They were intense, particularly The Dark Knight, and they were frightening in the sense of plausibility of anarchic terrorism at home. Unfortunately this has just become sort of normal now, we're more accustomed to school shootings or random shootings or tons of everyday intense violence.... if only our real villains were as upfront about things as Joker... as slippery and supernatural as he is, at least he's just one guy.
All things considered, the Nolan films probably have the overall SUNNIEST view of Bruce/Batman/Gotham out of anything. He has a clear purpose. He has a specific endgame. He retires happily, as successful as a ninja-dracula private detective working probono could possibly be. Every other version has Bruce sticking with it until old age or death. Nolan allows Bruce and Selina to run off into the sunset.
In conclusion -- it's not especially dark in the way that the word implies. It's about characters who are in darkness, but the films itself are uplifting and optimistic, if in a sort of cockeyed way.