Originally Posted by
Ferro
the thing is havok is a very very priveledged member of a community he has never really represented before, a community that's very diverse on it's range of experiences, many mutants HAVE come together in communities like the morlocks or in now dead communities like m town and genosha, both destroyed by two seperate genocides.
the concept of a mutant community wasnt nonexistant it was just constantly destroyed, and havok pretty much wants to speak for all mutants and claim himself as alex, because truly that's the only thing that seperates him from the type of priveledge captain america and the avengers enjoy is his pesky mutant status.
The book tries to sell the idea mutants aren't a sub-culture when thats blantantly untrue and has the worst possible mutant to speak about it.
So he's pretty much claiming mutants have no sense of unity, wich is completly wrong, AND bends over backwards to make the woman responsible for the destruction whatever mutant culture was left after genosha, to be the righteous, moral and "logical" to a point of being condescending over the petty, arrogant and rash mutants that have the nerve to still hate her for the atrocities she commited.
that's why many x-men fans were upset, because it felt like a toxic take from an outsider that clearly had no passion for it's themes dragging it trough the mud and using a book that was supposed to be about unity to spout criticism to one side and one side only while the avengers remain logical, optimistic, heroic and wise, but now have to deal with the pesky mutants.