Originally Posted by
Tzigone
The entire Kathy/Kate, Bette/Betty thing was really not fantastically done, IMO. Obviously it comes down to differing needs over 20+ (okay 60+) years of of comics, but it has resulted in a bit of a jumble - mostly later on. And certainly no worse than plenty of other jumbles, though that's hardly praise. I think it goes like this, but with comic books, I'm not sure I trust my analysis.
Firstly, Kathy Unrelated-to-Bruce and later-introduced niece Betty was simple.
Then there was no Kathy, and Bette became a hero on her own. Also simple, since pre-COIE wasn't considered canon anymore.
Then we had Kate Unrelated-to-Bruce and no Kathy. And that's where I tend to fall on the preference spectrum, since I perceive Kate as more important than Kathy, given number of appearances and her appearing in a era of more continuity and connectededness between titles. The only issues that really come up there is whether or not Kate is related to Bette and also that it results in Bette heroing long before Kate did (sort of like Donna was several years in and Diana a rookie in early post-COIE, but it doesn't bother me in the case of Kate and Bette, since they've become decoupled in my mind with Bette existing so long as Flamebird without Kate, even if not heavily used).
Then Kate becomes related to Bruce and thus has family money (which is certainly a contradiction from earlier when the money came from her stepmother). Bette turns out to be related to her (and ends up her sidekick, I guess - haven't read those - even though we saw her active years before Kate which really bugs me and turns into a bit of copy-Kate with a completely different personality than she had post-COIE, though she did copy Kathy originally, so there's still a Kathy=Kateish dynamnic), and so Bette was into a (non-blood) family member when she was crushing on Dick, which I don't care for. But then there's Kathy, and that's where I really do lose the plot.