Results 1 to 15 of 84

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Fantastic Member Dzika_Sowa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    337

    Default Were web shooters really such a problem in Raimi's film trilogy?

    I remember watching the first Spider-Man as a kid, and I couldn't understand why they decided to introduce an organic web.

    It really made no sense to me. Where would Peter be storing web fluid? Underarms? In the butt? Also, in the original comic book, the creation of the web fluid formula proved Parker could become a scientist.

    So... why were web shooters abandoned? The dude flying the glider in the green haloween armor was scientifically achievable, but the artificial web wasn't?

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    34,115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dzika_Sowa View Post
    I remember watching the first Spider-Man as a kid, and I couldn't understand why they decided to introduce an organic web.

    It really made no sense to me. Where would Peter be storing web fluid? Underarms? In the butt? Also, in the original comic book, the creation of the web fluid formula proved Parker could become a scientist.
    All the things about Peter's powers and this is the one that bugs you? And it isn't like the web shooters are the only evidence of Peter's intelligence.

    So... why were web shooters abandoned?
    Probably because they figured, "why not give him web shooters?"

    The dude flying the glider in the green haloween armor was scientifically achievable, but the artificial web wasn't?
    The flying glider and goblin armor were built by a million-dollar company. If you include the web shooters you have to explain where Peter got the materials from, how he could afford them and why he doesn't use it to improve his and his family's financial situation.

  3. #3
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    9,358

    Default

    The decision to remove the web shooters in favor of "organic webbing" was made by James Cameron when he worked on the screenplay for a prospective Spider-Man adaptation. That was there in the screenplay and drafts well before Raimi came on.

    Raimi obviously didn't think it was a problem. From what I read, the thinking was that it made things simpler to sell the wish fulfillment of Spider-Man getting all these powers and abilities in a single go than to spend time showing how Peter came up with the web fluid and then developed the wrist cartridges.

  4. #4
    The King Fears NO ONE! Triniking1234's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    10,950

    Default

    Organic web shooters got rid of the "no ammo" deus ex machina that was getting pretty rampant in Spidey stories. Thank God.
    "Cable was right!"

  5. #5
    Kinky Lil' Canine Snoop Dogg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,097

    Default

    Peter just drinks water to promote the production of his sticky white fluids. It was all about appealing to the young adult demographic.
    I don't blind date I make the direct market vibrate

  6. #6
    Incredible Member Spidey_62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    884

    Default

    I really don't think it was a problem. Just streamlines the whole affair a bit more- get bit by a spider and just get all the powers. They still had Peter's love of science on display, but it just comes down to if it bugs you or not. They were still able to do the "out of web fluid" bit in SM2 with him losing his powers due to anxiety/stress/depression which was taken from ASM Annual #1.

  7. #7
    Loony Scott Taylor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Running Springs, California
    Posts
    9,396

    Default

    Made sense to me. We saw how well showing him "invent" the webs went in the ASM movie. It was a practical throw-away sequence and dumb. Fortunately they went back to the "he just has webs, deal with it" approach in the MCU.

    By the way, in terms of most powerful webs in all the movies, I'd give it to the organic webs. They are still closest to the comic version.
    Every day is a gift, not a given right.

  8. #8
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    9,358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spidey_62 View Post
    I really don't think it was a problem. Just streamlines the whole affair a bit more- get bit by a spider and just get all the powers. They still had Peter's love of science on display, but it just comes down to if it bugs you or not. They were still able to do the "out of web fluid" bit in SM2 with him losing his powers due to anxiety/stress/depression which was taken from ASM Annual #1.
    I didn't have an issue with organic webbing in the first film, but I did in the second film because it went overboard with the web-fluid is a metaphor for sexual potency thing.

    I think organic webbing was a decision made to introduce Spider-Man in the first film made by people who weren't sure if it was guaranteed to succeed well enough to have a follow-up. Organic webbing makes a lot of sense as a streamlined origin thing but not as an ongoing element. Since as you guys mentioned, Spider-Man running out of webs can't be something you can use with endless webbing.

    Likewise, the third movie introduced the Symbiote. In the comics, the Symbiote was the first time Spider-Man had unlimited organic webbing in the comics...and the Symbiote giving Peter those extra powers and advantages was part of the appeal of that costume to Peter and the reader. If he has organic webbing before he gets the Symbiote, where's the sense that the Symbiote is addictive enough/tempting enough for Peter to like the Symbiote and prefer it to his normal costume?

    The later movies had a sense of guarantee about follow-ups so they used web-fluids and shooters, even if other issues come up (like Garfield simply pilfers the formula off Oscorp rather than create it himself). Holland at least made the formula and original shooter design with Tony Stark coming up with those gadgets (which sucked in a different sense).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •