If Hickman's run was pretentious it would have more incomprehensible monologues and lines that feel like they came straight out of r/Iam14andthisisdeep.
december 21st has passed where are my superpowers?
-The Brood have a new leader
-We have discovered that Vulcan is an unwitting sleeper agent of some unknown villains, perhaps the Cancerverse.
-Summoner came to Krakoa and Apocalypse used the External Gate, which is the cause of all X of Swords
-Kurt has decided to found a new religion
-Hordeculture was introduced, which is a new team of villains.
-A team was sent to deal with the Children of the Vault, who are the precursors of Homo novissima.
Came through with the facts. I’m personally excited to see where a lot of these stories go. One of the benefits of Hickman (and like I mentioned earlier there are also cons) is that I can feel pretty confident that he actually plans on following through on all of his storylines and that he’s not just throwing stuff at a wall hoping it’ll stick.
The one major criticism I don't get is "Hickman only cares about his OCs". He gave Apocalypse, Monet, Cypher, Sage, the entire cast of The Five, Exodus - hell even Charles & Moira themselves - their most relevant roles in the X-Men comics in millenia but now he only cares about his OCs because he (& Tini & the rest of the X-Office) created new characters for a plot about an ancient mutant society? How dare he
Last edited by nandes; 11-06-2020 at 06:38 AM.
I disagree. Hickman's stuff does connect, they are just one shot issues. The Mystique issue connects to HOX. these one shot stories are used to develop characters so that when they do something insane or extraordinary, we can look back and say "well that makes sense." give it time
Eh. Well. My opinion is that it started in the Mariana Trench and is now at bout the core. I don't think I could possibly care less about Arakko, Otherworld, or any swords. Once upon a time, the X-Men were about important real life things, but that's no longer the case. From the get-go, Hickman has only made the X-Books even less approachable and relevant than they've ever been. It's like Marvel took every valid criticism of the X-Books over the past decade or more (how they don't fit well with the broader Marvel universe, etc.) and magnified them a hundredfold.
f/k/a The Black Guardian
COEXIST | NOEXIST
ShadowcatMagikДаякѕтая Sto☈mDustMercury MonetRachelSage
MagnetoNightcrawlerColossusRockslideBeastXavier
Yes, arcs like Dark Phoenix Saga, the Brood saga and Age of Apocalypse were about important real life things.
Much more relatable and grounded than the dynamics that occur in a newly founded nation, how cultural elements are formed or the emancipation of minorities.
Of course Arakko is only about swords, it does not examine with parallels to Krakoa how two societies of similar origins can develop in drastically different ways depending on the political and cultural context in which they find themselves and how that affects their people.
Last edited by Glio; 11-06-2020 at 11:50 AM.
I can say X of Swords isn't as exciting as Infinity. By now Shuri would've nuked Atlantis and Namor hit Wakanda with a Get Gud.
"Cable was right!"
X-Men only focused on real life stuff like 5% of the time.
"Cable was right!"
And Krakoa also has parallels with reality, about emancipation, nationalism, capitalism, community...
The whole Xavier, Magneto and Apocalypse meeting in Davos is about the influence of economic systems on racism, which is more interesting and novel in the franchise than "People are racist because they are ignorant."
But as you said: Hickman has never suffered real discrimination (Like Claremont, Morrison or the dozens of white cis straight writers the franchise has had). So, wisely in my opinion, he decides to write about it from a different perspective.
In the 21st century, paralleling mutants with real racism in a direct way seems like a bad idea because there are too many "buts." But if you take it to a conceptual level of "nation", I think you can tell something