Rorschach #2 Discussion/Spoilers

[Rakzo]

Okay, this story took a twist that I wasn't expecting.

Tom King brings a new chapter and, while the first one didn't leave a real impression about where the title was going, this one is much clearer. First of all, you must know about Steve Ditko, the creator of several comic characters over the years including Spider-Man, Blue Beetle (Ted Kord) and especially both The Question and Mr. A, the latter two were heroes that heavily inspired Alan Moore in the creation of Rorschach. Why is this important? Well, because in this same issue we're introduced to an artist named William Myerson who has a huge resemblance to Ditko, particularly how he lived the latter years of his life mostly in reclusion after the problems he had with comic companies concerning his creations and he even created a character called The Citizen who, of course, is very similar to both The Question and Rorschach, and his stories were depicted in a manner how he appeared in the Mr. A black and white comics. I should have expected this from King after Mister Miracle but still the appearance of a comic creator in story still really surprised me.

Mind you, King also takes a few twists with the plot including Myerson's failed relationship with a woman he date and whose new husband maked fun of him for years because of it which leads to the inclusion of Rorschach into the conflict, something that implies that there's even a bigger mystery going on here than I initially thought. Things are reaching a supernatural level now.

Jorge Fornes handles the art and his style is perfect for the story due to how much of a classic tone he has, he kinda even makes young Myerson look like Peter Parker which I don't think is much of a reach concerning all the themes going on.

Great read, invested now.

[lordozone]

I just flipped through, it was extremely boring. And I rather enjoyed the first episode. And then to have a clone of Steve Ditko, who would surely have hated Tom King and the way he's stealing someone else's work, is quite ironic. It lacks a bit of class. But it's not surprising either, for some time now Tom King has been sorely lacking in class towards his colleagues.

[Noodle]

I just flipped through, it was extremely boring. And I rather enjoyed the first episode. And then to have a clone of Steve Ditko, who would surely have hated Tom King and the way he's stealing someone else's work, is quite ironic. It lacks a bit of class. But it's not surprising either, for some time now Tom King has been sorely lacking in class towards his colleagues.

Tom King isn't "stealing" anything. DC has gone back to the Watchmen material numerous times since the original series. If King didn't do this series DC would have just hired someone else to do it.

[lordozone]

Tom King isn't "stealing" anything. DC has gone back to the Watchmen material numerous times since the original series. If King didn't do this series DC would have just hired someone else to do it.

"If I didn't do it someone else would have done it" has never been a good excuse to commit an immoral act. Anyway, I'm not Alan Moore's great defender either, he's big enough to do it on his own. It was just the use of Steve Ditko, in this particular work, that I didn't think was very appropriate.

[Noodle]

"If I didn't do it someone else would have done it" has never been a good excuse to commit an immoral act. Anyway, I'm not Alan Moore's great defender either, he's big enough to do it on his own. It was just the use of Steve Ditko, in this particular work, that I didn't think was very appropriate.

I'd hardly consider this an "immoral act."

The Ditko thing I can't speak to as he's not around to say one way or the other. Did he object to his image being used before he passed? If so then, yes, it wasn't a wise move on King's part.

[Rakzo]

Apparently homages are considered immoral acts now.

Man, the whole comic history is full of those terrible acts now that I think about it.