Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112
Results 166 to 178 of 178
  1. #166
    Extraordinary Member Crimz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    8,024

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CaptCleghorn View Post
    It's semantics at this point, but John Byrne wrote the first Johnny and Alicia paring. At that time, Alicia was really Alicia. Tom DeFalco retconned that into being Lyja. In Marvel's defense, the Johnny/Alicia match was incredibly ugly given Johnny and Ben's relationship and replacing Alicia with a Skrull seemed the best way out of a terrible plot development. So technically, it wasn't the writer of the story, but the next writer who changed the situation. It's still assault, but who gets what blame easily gets confused.
    I understand that and I think it's one of those cases where a fix to one situation led to unfortunate consequences. I also dislike the idea of Johnny and Alicia and understand why Lyja was created to fix that. I just think that it should be acknowledged that what she did was sexual assault and it shouldn't be ignored because it's an inconvenient truth. The idea of her and Johnny being in a romantic relationship should be thrown out the window because after what she did it sends a really bad message.
    Be sure to check out the Invisible Woman appreciation thread!

  2. #167
    Mighty Member Thundershot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,376

    Default

    See, this revelation made me angry... unlike Superior Spider-Man, which I thoroughly enjoyed (waiting for a reprint of Complete Collection v2, Marvel!), which we all knew would eventually have the real Peter return... I don’t see Franklin getting reversed any more than Pietro and Wanda. As far as I’m concerned, they’re all still mutants. Every single mutant doesn’t need to be on Krakoa. I’m just waiting for someone to say Justice isn’t a mutant anymore.... that would piss me off too.

  3. #168
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    4,112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thundershot View Post
    See, this revelation made me angry... unlike Superior Spider-Man, which I thoroughly enjoyed (waiting for a reprint of Complete Collection v2, Marvel!), which we all knew would eventually have the real Peter return... I don’t see Franklin getting reversed any more than Pietro and Wanda. As far as I’m concerned, they’re all still mutants. Every single mutant doesn’t need to be on Krakoa. I’m just waiting for someone to say Justice isn’t a mutant anymore.... that would piss me off too.
    Retcons like this is normal in comic books, and they will get reversed when the people who disagree with those decisions are get into management.

  4. #169
    Ultimate Member jackolover's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    10,172

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hypestyle View Post
    So is there another category now for Powered people whose abilities are natural but did not have something "done to them" later in life (adolescence, adulthood, etc., such as Bruce Banner, Peter Parker, Matt Murdock)?

    For the longest time, it was implicitly accepted that all children of powered people who had powers were "mutants" in some way (even if you were the sort to nitpick and insist that "true mutants" can only have abilities that neither parent has, it was still an accepted premise. Thus Daken is a mutant via his father Wolverine, etc.).

    The abruptness of "he's not a mutant, end of story, see ya" just comes across as incredibly arbitrary, even by comic-book-logic standards.
    My understanding is that people who had their powers “done to them” as you call it, (example Reed Richards and Sue Storm after getting cosmic rays powers later in life) who then have children like Franklin and Valeria, can have transferred their abilities to their children. Mutants are another category as these people hand down their mutant gene to their children. The difference between both sources of parents, (Normal but later altered, versus mutant gene transfer) is very vague. I suspect there is some test that verifies powered parents, and another test that verifies mutant gene parental transfer. Somehow, that has been the case in the Marvel Universe this whole time. I myself have made this assumption for decades, otherwise, how would the bigoted mutant killers have identified who was a mutant and who was the child of a super powered person?

    Maybe Dan Slott has brought up a very important issue regarding mutant identification, by having Professor X state he couldn’t determine that Franklin was not a mutant. If Prof X and his Cerebro computer can’t pick a mutant, what can? Up till now, Cerebro has been the accepted determining factor for mutant identification. It supposes all children born to super powered parents (like Reed and Sue), do not appear on Cerebros radar. If Reed and Sue’s child appears as a mutant red dot, does Luke Cage and Jessica Jones’ Danielle appear as a mutant red dot too?

    I would want to know that the difference is substantial, or, why segregate mutants in the first place? That’s what makes this so important.
    Last edited by jackolover; 11-23-2020 at 08:59 PM.

  5. #170
    Astonishing Member Drops Of Venus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    4,853

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hypestyle View Post
    So is there another category now for Powered people whose abilities are natural but did not have something "done to them" later in life (adolescence, adulthood, etc., such as Bruce Banner, Peter Parker, Matt Murdock)?

    For the longest time, it was implicitly accepted that all children of powered people who had powers were "mutants" in some way (even if you were the sort to nitpick and insist that "true mutants" can only have abilities that neither parent has, it was still an accepted premise. Thus Daken is a mutant via his father Wolverine, etc.).

    The abruptness of "he's not a mutant, end of story, see ya" just comes across as incredibly arbitrary, even by comic-book-logic standards.
    I assume you mean regular human characters born with powers, 'cause there are a lot of non-human or human hybrid characters that were born with powers without being mutants (like the Asgardians, Eternals, Inhumans/NuHumans, America Chavez, Hellstorm, Carol Danvers after the retcon, etc). As for regular human characters born with powers, the first example I can think of someone who broke the mutant rule was Mr. Immortal. At one point, it was established he wasn't Homo Superior, but Homo Supreme, which I guess made him distinct from your regular mutant in a way. Funnily enough, I think it was Dan Slott himself who established that Homo Supreme was a thing, so I guess he was always onto the idea that people can be born with powers and be something other than mutant. Maybe he wants Franklin to be Homo Supreme as well?

    Some retcons have created more characters like this (although the term Homo Supreme hasn't been used in those cases). Squirrel Girl is now a part of some mysterious, unnamed species, since her solo book established she was born with powers, but was not a mutant. The Scarlet Witch solo book also established that the Maximoffs came from a long line of witches and wizards, so even though they were High Evolutionary experiments in their new origin, now they also have some innate arcane power from birth too. My guess is that Wiccan and Speed also fall under that category, assuming they're not mutants. DC has a category for people born with magic powers (Homo Magi, I think), so I guess Marvel could create some similar labels now that they have enough characters that don't fit in the mutant category anymore.

  6. #171
    Keeper of the Torch Ravin' Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Where the Diwatas and the Triumph Division live
    Posts
    8,793

    Default

    Ah, Marvel genetics and heredity. I'm no longer comfortable with the definition that a mutant has to have the x-gene. Maybe "Mutant" with a capital "M" as used by the X-Men, but if you are born with other genes that grant you powers you are still a mutant of the human race, just not an x-gene Mutant. Lyra the Savage She-Hulk? Inherited gamma-radiation from her father the Hulk as well as her mother Thundra's enhanced strength, and that technically makes her a mutant, but not an x-gene Mutant. So Franklin is analogously a mutant.
    Human Torch/Fantastic Four/She-Hulk/Disney Big Hero 6 /Tangled/G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero/Transformers G1 fanatic, Avatar-maker, and Marvel Moderator
    "一人じゃないから。" AI、『Story』。
    "ヒロ、お前を信じてる。" タダシ、『ベイマックス』。
    "You were my my new dream." "And you were mine." Eugene Fitzherbert and Rapunzel.
    "Knowing is half the battle."
    G.I. Joe.
    Know the CBR Community STANDARDS & RULES

  7. #172
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    4,112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravin' Ray View Post
    Ah, Marvel genetics and heredity. I'm no longer comfortable with the definition that a mutant has to have the x-gene. Maybe "Mutant" with a capital "M" as used by the X-Men, but if you are born with other genes that grant you powers you are still a mutant of the human race, just not an x-gene Mutant. Lyra the Savage She-Hulk? Inherited gamma-radiation from her father the Hulk as well as her mother Thundra's enhanced strength, and that technically makes her a mutant, but not an x-gene Mutant. So Franklin is analogously a mutant.
    Marvel's figured out what to call mutants like that, it's "mutate." They have to categorise all the various super-humans or it gets really confusing. Not all super-human species are born mutants, that's how we get Inhumans and Eternals. Thanos is an exception in that he's an Eternal who is also a mutant. But the fact is Franklin is a disposable weapon to Xavier, if it wasn't this he'd be another pawn in his plans, the days of Xavier caring about his mutant pupils are long over.

  8. #173
    Astonishing Member Zelena's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    4,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravin' Ray View Post
    Ah, Marvel genetics and heredity. I'm no longer comfortable with the definition that a mutant has to have the x-gene. Maybe "Mutant" with a capital "M" as used by the X-Men, but if you are born with other genes that grant you powers you are still a mutant of the human race, just not an x-gene Mutant. Lyra the Savage She-Hulk? Inherited gamma-radiation from her father the Hulk as well as her mother Thundra's enhanced strength, and that technically makes her a mutant, but not an x-gene Mutant. So Franklin is analogously a mutant.
    Mutates, mutants… it wouldn’t make a difference if the characters didn’t make a difference.
    If these “special people” are somehow a metaphor for difference in our society, it’s something they have all in common to be different from the norm. And still, there is almost no empathy anymore between “mutants” and the rest…

    The “heroes” are people that are strong, free individuals that speak to readers who considered themselves in the same way. The “mutants” are now “a people”, what they are individually is diluted in the group. I’m confused by the appeal.
    “Strength is the lot of but a few privileged men; but austere perseverance, harsh and continuous, may be employed by the smallest of us and rarely fails of its purpose, for its silent power grows irresistibly greater with time.” Goethe

  9. #174
    Extraordinary Member BroHomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Da Souf
    Posts
    6,743

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zelena View Post
    Mutates, mutants… it wouldn’t make a difference if the characters didn’t make a difference.
    If these “special people” are somehow a metaphor for difference in our society, it’s something they have all in common to be different from the norm. And still, there is almost no empathy anymore between “mutants” and the rest…

    The “heroes” are people that are strong, free individuals that speak to readers who considered themselves in the same way. The “mutants” are now “a people”, what they are individually is diluted in the group. I’m confused by the appeal.
    Of which group?
    GrindrStone(D)

  10. #175
    Astonishing Member Zelena's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    4,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroHomo View Post
    Of which group?
    The group of mutants.
    “Strength is the lot of but a few privileged men; but austere perseverance, harsh and continuous, may be employed by the smallest of us and rarely fails of its purpose, for its silent power grows irresistibly greater with time.” Goethe

  11. #176
    Astonishing Member ARkadelphia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    4,426

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hypestyle View Post
    The abruptness of "he's not a mutant, end of story, see ya" just comes across as incredibly arbitrary, even by comic-book-logic standards.
    Abrupt? This plot point has been building since the early days of Slott’s run dating back to last year.

    End of story? What makes you think that? This revelation just happened in the most recent issue. It’s likely one plot point in a much longer storyline that is far from finished.
    “The Avengers have been the one point of stability in my entire life. And if The Avengers call… then The Scarlet Witch will always answer.”

  12. #177
    Extraordinary Member Mike_Murdock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    7,855

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crimz View Post
    NOW THIS PART IS BIG. Franklin gets the device from Val and plans to use the Forever Gate to got to Krakoa. Suddenly, Xavier mentally contacts him and reveals that Franklin is not a mutant and never was a mutant. As a kid he accidently used his cosmic powers to give himself the X-gene - so he is not welcome on Krakoa.
    FWIW, this has always been my proposal for the Scarlet Witch - that she was a mutant but used her reality-altering powers to make her no longer a mutant.

    I don't think this Franklin retcon makes a ton of sense based on Marvel comics history. I recognize that he's always been a sort of black sheep of the mutant world and only rarely fit into the X-universe, but the same could be said about Typhoid Mary. I don't think this retcon was a good creative choice - especially so closely following Chip Zdarsky's really solid mini-series.
    Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother

    I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
    Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons

    Interested in reading Daredevil? Not sure what to read next? Why not check out the Daredevil Book Club for some ideas?

  13. #178
    Mighty Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    1,217

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike_Murdock View Post
    FWIW, this has always been my proposal for the Scarlet Witch - that she was a mutant but used her reality-altering powers to make her no longer a mutant.

    I don't think this Franklin retcon makes a ton of sense based on Marvel comics history. I recognize that he's always been a sort of black sheep of the mutant world and only rarely fit into the X-universe, but the same could be said about Typhoid Mary. I don't think this retcon was a good creative choice - especially so closely following Chip Zdarsky's really solid mini-series.
    This is the first time I've heard someone talk positively about that mini. I only got a chance to read the first two issues (I have the second two, but life got in the way and I never got the chance to read them, they are currently in storage).
    I really liked what I read, it was fun.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •