the MK book is fire so far.
Some people want to read books about characters who are just as miserable as they are.
Huston's MK run is one of my favorites. Always felt like it combined the vigilante + crazy in a good way.
Too many MK runs tend to focus on the crazy way too much for me (most recent ones).
Ellis was just an action comic, fun and a palate cleanser but not really complex in anyway.
Black Panther Discord Server: https://discord.gg/SA3hQerktm
T'challa's Greatest Comic Book Feats: http://blackpanthermarvel.blogspot.c...her-feats.html
I don't know how that will work based on what we know but I hope that too.
And I 100% expect a, "this is why the marriage would never work with you T'challa! You are a paranoid *******!" line from Storm.
I just hope Tchalla's response isn't hanging his head and going, "yes my dear." Gotta keep the base in his voice at this point.
Black Panther Discord Server: https://discord.gg/SA3hQerktm
T'challa's Greatest Comic Book Feats: http://blackpanthermarvel.blogspot.c...her-feats.html
T'Challa
A.K.A. The Black Panther
King of Wakanda
King of the Dead and The Champion of Bast
Two-Time Time Magazine "Person Of The Year"
Six-Time People Magazine "Sexiest Man Alive"
What would be cool is if Wakanda knew about the Arraki before the X-Men did. That's why the sword was in Wakanda and why BP didn't care if Storm took it.
Wakanda has had spies everywhere and people get pissed when they find out. How do they think Wakanda has so much intel on everyone on and off planet?
Ah, but as I've said before, bad plot, weak characterization, and florid dialogue are exactly what the "literary" crowd lap up.
I absolutely despise "literary fiction", because it's snobbish and elitist. "Stories that are 'exciting' and 'popular' are for commoners. We are more concerned with 'merit'."
I mean, listen to this claptrap:
Literary fiction often involves social commentary, political criticism, or reflection on the human condition. In general it focuses on "introspective, in-depth character studies" of "interesting, complex and developed" characters. This contrasts with genre fiction where plot is the central concern. Usually in literary fiction the focus is on the "inner story" of the characters who drive the plot, with detailed motivations to elicit "emotional involvement" in the reader. The style of literary fiction is often described as "elegantly written, lyrical, and ... layered". The tone of literary fiction can be darker than genre fiction, while the pacing of literary fiction may be slower than popular fiction. As Terrence Rafferty notes, "literary fiction, by its nature, allows itself to dawdle, to linger on stray beauties even at the risk of losing its way".
Not to mention you need writers who can write very well for literary fiction.If the entire focus is on characters then they need to be spot on, which most of comic writer using this method haven't accomplished
Ever read The Old Man and the Sea?
When a book is all about a character's internal dialogue, but nothing actually happens much, then the quality of characterization becomes meaningless.
"I woke up and stared at the photo of my late wife, gone 25 years now. I still remembered the perfume she wore. Lilacs & lavender."
*insert 25 pages of internal monologue about when he first smelled lilacs as a child. And another about how they both used to like peach jam for breakfast, but he hasn't had it since she died*
"And then, as I had the day off, I sat and watched television until lunch."
*insert 45 pages about the black & white TV his parents had in their living room, and how he used to have to fiddle with it in order to watch cartoons on Saturday mornings*
Get the idea?
It might be bearable in prose. But in a superhero comic...
It works depending on the medium. Hemingway’s writing style is an absolute bore to me but he’d probably write a better comic than James Joyce or Thomas Wolfe. Directness and a dedication to meaning in brevity is a lost art in a lot of modern literature across the board.
A single wordless panel of T’Challa spoilers:end of spoilers does more to communicate T’Challa’s stress and isolation than him poetically reciting how he basically hates being king lol. But it’s also a matter of preference IMO because sometimes those long extended internal dialogues can work to great effect, like Hickman’s intro to T’Challa when he convened with the Illuminati. But you can’t build an entire comic around philosophical platitudes and moral debates. Or around overly sensitive characters that don’t actively move the plot. The literary crowd won’t be kind to Ridley’s run, just like how most of them would probably hate the Priest run if they ever got around to reading it.
crying on the ground after hearing about Jhai’s death