You know you're doing your job right when you don't even need to say anything to get a mention.
I've said before that there's a lot of unexplored territory in Lorna and Magneto's relationship. It's only recently been restored, there's decades worth of possibilities we haven't seen pursued yet. All of this remains true.
However, it's not a blank slate either. They have history. They have a foundation to work from. That history and foundation should matter in any attempt to explore their relationship. Unfortunately, Marvel has been ignoring both for most of the past decade.
My
semi-joke post of a few days ago has layers. Compare the
original page in my first post on this thread to what was cut in the joke post. Lorna in her origin story was presented as a tangible threat in her own right. Even as what appeared to be a newly awakened mutant, she commanded respect and fear before her turn to fight alongside the X-Men. Much of that was, yes, because Magneto is her father. But not because she could run to him for help. Not because Magneto "owned" her personhood. She commanded respect and fear from the perception that she
inherited his magnificence and awesome power.
In her very first appearance, she was not presented as daddy's weak little girl who needs to be pampered, spoiled and protected by her father, and who can't handle the idea of conflict - despite late 60s standards of how to treat women. Her first appearance presented her as a
queen of mutants who could pose a serious threat to all the X-Men combined if she chose to be their enemy.
Much of Marvel has forgotten that Lorna, as their image of her has been that of a woman whose chief value is to be constantly used and abused for the benefit of other characters, whether they be villains, so-called allies, or the one (1) boyfriend she's ever been allowed to have. Without any catharsis. No second half where Lorna gets to stand for herself and redeem any damage done to her image. Just a lot of misuse. Unfortunately, we've seen Lorna's dynamics with her father tainted by this attitude as well.
Thankfully, there's still plenty of time to fix it and do better going forward. It will just take Marvel spending some time to look at what their own writers have done in the past and moving forward from there. And I don't mean "This one writer I liked did this thing so I'll just copy him and leave it at that, bam, give me money." I mean putting real thought into what she's been through from her perspective, all the way back to the original core conception of her and what sensibly builds off that conception.
People don't write Batman as a goofy funnyman type that does weird things, following the vein of how the 60s TV show and comics around the time presented him that way. Writers eventually recognized the core concept of him from when he was created, and honored and built off of it, leading to the popularly known Batman of today. Same should apply to any other character.